Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: nexus

 Thanks for your comments on the crystallographic neXus project. I'm glad
> that we are now able to begin working on this. I am copying this response to
> Lachlan, with a reminder that he can monitor our discussions at
> http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/lists/epc-l/
> > The basic idea is excellent. The aim is to distribute a number of data
> > available on the Web on a CD-ROM for those who have a poor or no access
> > at all to the web.
> Yes. However, it is also useful for people who have quite a good connection
> to the Web, because even "quite good" can mean long and frustrating download
> sessions if one is surveying many pages, or acquiring large software packages.
> > Each time Lachlan make a reference he gives two links:
> >  - the true URL
> >  - the copy of the contents of this URL on the CD-ROM. Thus, whenever
> > possible, the user may report to the original information. This is a
> > very clever idea.
> For the constituency of web-connected users, it means that you can check the
> "live" URL to see whether a more recent version of the software exists than
> on the CD-ROM; if not, the CD-ROM version can be installed at once.

As we say in french: qui peut le plus peut le moins. In other words I fully
agree. Lachlan idea of giving BOTH the true URL and a copy of its contents at a
given date is excellent and may be useful to everybody. One may also be
delighted to be able to browse the CD from home without having a web 

> It is in some sense complementary to the SinCris and CWW lists of pointers
> to other crystallographic sites. The major difference is that the neXus
> collection mirrors the contents of the sites listed (in whole or in part).
> > Obviously the contents is oriented towards Lachlan's primary interests. There
> > are many references to mineralogy, powder diffraction and databases
> > related to these subjects. The same is true for the software. No reference
> > at all (or very few) to biocrystallography for instance.
> Lachlan's primary role has been to collect and organise the information on
> the CD-ROM, and to burn the many trial copies that he has produced. It's
> entirely legitimate that the contents until now have reflected his own
> interests and areas of expertise. It might make sense to build on his work
> by recruiting other volunteers to manage collections in other areas of the
> subject. Lachlan could be the mineralogy/powder editor and overall technical
> coordinator; there would in time be other editors too. I think that at this
> stage we can concentrate on getting the project fully operational within
> Lachlan's selected topic areas; but he should give some thought to the
> overall organisation to allow additional topics to be added in a modular
> fashion.

I fully agree. See below my suggestion.

> > The list of institutions has the same limitation: IUCr references are all
> > included as well as a very limited number of crystallographic institutions.
> > I do not know why other are not mentioned. For instance a reference is made
> > towards the Synchrotron facility in Taiwan but not to the other ones.
> In previous correspondence, Howard has raised doubts about the suitability
> of including mirrors of individual institutions (such as the Cuban
> laboratories). The problem is really one of selection (or, alternatively, of
> finding enough filespace for an arbitrarily large collection of such
> institutions). We will need to discuss in some detail the balance of
> providing pointers to other external URLs (this is already well covered
> within SinCris and CWW) and mirroring the contents of other sites, be they
> national, regional or in some sense private pages.

I believe the CD-ROM could make refrences to
- international institutions
- national institutions such as National Crystallographic Associations, National
laboratories such as synchrotrons... but not to individual laboratories.

> > References are also made to some personal pages but I do not understand
> > how the selection has been made.
> I would guess that the selection has been on the basis of Lachlan's
> knowledge and editorial judgement. I see nothing wrong in that, though we
> might consider a broader based editorial board in due course. We might also
> expect that if the project really took off, individuals would be canvassing
> for the inclusion of their own pages, so some sort of objective criteria for
> inclusion should be drawn up.

In some ways it is a duplicate of WDC.

> > Thus I will conclude that Nexus is, for the moment, a good project, but
> > limited to some fields of crystallography and with a selection of pointers
> > based on the personal interests of his author.
> Let me outline the way in which I see the neXus project fitting into the
> IUCr information web. Logically, we should have a directory tree mounted as
> nexus-top which peers with iucr-top, cww-top and sincris-top. It will hold
> the neXus pages that index other resources, and also the mirrors of the
> individual software collections that have been acquired. The IUCr, CWW and
> SinCris pages will be accessed by hyperlinks into the iucr-top etc
> hierarchies. Hence the directory structure on my web server and its mirrors
> will be:
>            __________________________________________
>            |             |            |             |
>         iucr-top      cww-top    sincris-top    nexus-top
> and it will be identical on the CD-ROM, but perhaps with an addition
> higher-level introductory html page:
>                            nexus.html
>            ____________________|_____________________
>            |             |            |             |
>         iucr-top      cww-top    sincris-top    nexus-top
> In practical terms, Lachlan would maintain the nexus-top pages at Daresbury,
> and I would mirror them on a daily basis at Chester (in the same way that
> CWW is maintained in Geneva and SinCris in Paris). Lachlan would download
> iucr-top, cww-top and sincris-top whenever he needs to press an up-to-date
> disk. The mirror sites would download everything from Chester.
> Do we all agree on this approach?

I fully agree with this approach which is in agreement with my suggestion for
the web services as explained to the Executive Committee in Seattle.

I am willing to leave all the mineralogical part to Lachlan and as soon as this
is established I will pass to him the responsibility for mineralogy and powder


Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Council for Science (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ICSU Committee on Data. Member of ICSTI, the International Council for Scientific and Technical Information. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

ICSU Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.