Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Re: FW: Supreme Court Rules on Tasini vs. New York Times

  • To: Multiple recipients of list <epc-l@iucr.org>
  • Subject: Fwd: Re: FW: Supreme Court Rules on Tasini vs. New York Times
  • From: Howard Flack <Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:34:56 +0100 (BST)

----- Forwarded message from Eamon Fennessy <efennessy@ATT.NET> -----
    Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 20:53:37 +0000
    From: Eamon Fennessy <efennessy@ATT.NET>
 Subject: Re: FW: Supreme Court Rules on Tasini vs. New York Times

The Supreme Court decision simply confirms what the law
has said for the past several decades.
    1. Anyone who is using someone else's intellectual
property online or wherever had best get permission.
    2. Publishers like the NY Times will start removing
old articles from online databases for which no
permission has been obtained.
    3. Some publishers have been obtaining permissions
since the mid 1990's as this case which I believe
started in 1993 was wending its way through the courts.
    4. The decision confirms you cannot take anything
for granted and for those clearing houses which offer
licenses to users for works which are to be put online
had best be sure they (the clearinghouses) have the
rights to offer online use to their clients. They (the
clearinghouses) cannot assume publishers have the rights
which they are conferring on those clearinghouses.

Eamon T. Fennessy
The Copyright Group
P.O. Box 5496
Beverly Farms, MA 01915

Phone & FAX (978) 927 9936
> FYI,
> Kurt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gail Hodge [mailto:Gailhodge@AOL.COM]
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:35 PM
> Subject: FYI:Supreme Court Rules on Tasini vs. New York Times
> In a ruling that is likely to have a major impact on authors,
> and
> secondary database producers, the Supreme Court has ruled on the case
> Tasini vs. New York Times.
> http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/06/25/scotus.copyright.ap/index.html
> From the CNN article:
>  "The court ruled 7-2 that compilation in an electronic
> database is different from other kinds of archival or library storage
> material that once appeared in print. That means that copyright laws
> big media companies such as The New York Times to get free-lancers'
> permission before posting their work online."
> The decision itself is likely to be available online soon.  While the
> article
> signals out big media companies and free lancers, this is expected to
> an
> impact on author/publisher relations in general.  It should be noted
> many publishers have already gone to so called "Martian" permissions
> they ask for copyright transfer everywhere, anytime, and in any media.
> isn't clear what the impact might be on permissions done under the
> regime
> before permission and copyright transfer agreements included
> versions.  Some anticipate that rather than try to get permissions
> authors of old material, publishers may just remove that material
> electronic databases.
> Gail

----- End forwarded message -----

Currently out of town
Howard Flack        http://www.unige.ch/crystal/ahdf/Howard.Flack.html
Laboratoire de Cristallographie               Phone: +41 22 702 62 49
24 quai Ernest-Ansermet             mailto:Howard.Flack@cryst.unige.ch
CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland                   Fax: +41 22 702 61 08

Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Council for Science (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ICSU Committee on Data. Member of ICSTI, the International Council for Scientific and Technical Information. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

ICSU Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.