[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
[Fwd: LISNews.com | Wikipedia -- can open source be a good source?]
- To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
- Subject: [Fwd: LISNews.com | Wikipedia -- can open source be a good source?]
- From: Howard Flack <[email protected]>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:03:04 +0200
Very interesting in relation to authoritative works like International Tables for Crystallography. H.
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: LISNews.com | Wikipedia -- can open source be a good source?
- From: Barry Mahon <[email protected]>
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 09:49:28 +0100
- Approved-by: [email protected]
- Reply-to: ICSTI-L list <[email protected]>
Hi, At this URL: <URL: http://www.lisnews.com/article.pl?sid=04/08/26/1337250 > There is a discussion on the potential risks associated with Wikipedia, a user written and edited Encyclopedia which is very popular with students as a quick information source. The questions that are discussed include the 'value' of user written entries, the accuracy of citations, etc., all the base issues which have also been discussed in the Open Source debate. Bye, Barry
_______________________________________________ Epc mailing list [email protected] http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/epc
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: News items
- Next by Date: ICSTI: news items
- Prev by thread: Fwd: Proceedings of Stockholm Meeting - European Science Open Forum;session on science publishing
- Next by thread: News items
- Index(es):