[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: ICSTI 2009 conference
- To: "IUCr Committee on Electronic Publishing, Dissemination and Storage of Information" <epc@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: ICSTI 2009 conference
- From: Brian McMahon <bm@iucr.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:00:33 +0100
- In-Reply-To: <4A803A27.7010805@Flack.ch>
- References: <20090613001141.GA14537@emerald.iucr.org><4A803A27.7010805@Flack.ch>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 05:17:59PM +0200, Howard Flack wrote: >> Liz Lyon of UKOLN (Libraries and "Team Science") > > How is it that she decided to concentrate on crystallography in her > project? As a result of the connection with Mike Hursthouse and Simon Coles at Southampton, which now goes back a number of years. The interest originally was in using "institutional repository" software as a platform for disseminating scientific data. JISC is very keen to encourage institutional repositories; the Southampton e-Prints software is liked in part because it is "home-grown"; the National Crystallography Service server uses e-Prints; UKOLN has often been charged by JISC with comparative evaluations and surveys. It's also involved with Research Information Network, Digital Curation Centre and other central agencies in a series of initiatives to map out and direct digital publishing policy in UK academia. The IUCr collaborated actively in the design of metadata standards for "repository" crystallography servers, and we've also been involved in advisory or consultative roles with a number of subsequent projects. The work is valuable in increasing the awareness of central policy makers within these areas; its usefulness in furthering crystallographic practice is less clear, but you should perhaps follow that up with Simon Coles. >> It is noteworthy that this was a conference sponsored by ICSTI, >> since the content would have seemed entirely natural in a >> CODATA meeting. It is clear that the traditional data/publication >> dichotomy is no longer appropriate to the processes of >> dissemination of scientific and technical information, and we >> may look forward to many future synergies between these two aspects. > > You mean that they are talking again about amalgamating CODATA and ICSTI? No (but the IUCr representative to ICSTI has raised the possibility in local discussions within the IUCr). Amalgamation would be difficult, given the very different institutional arrangements of the two bodies; and in principle they are addressing different areas, although the amount of overlap is increasing. At the moment ICSU sees them both as components of its strategic development, but it does want to see them working together more closely on matters of common relevance. ICSTI currently suffers from too little involvement of scientific publishers. I shall be leading a one-day workshop in Paris next February (which Yves has most kindly agreed to accommodate) that is intended to attract publishers; it will be interesting to see what success we have. I'll post more details of that workshop in the near future. Brian _______________________________________________ Epc mailing list Epc@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/epc
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- ICSTI 2009 conference (Brian McMahon)
- Re: ICSTI 2009 conference (Howard Flack)
- Prev by Date: Re: ICSTI 2009 conference
- Next by Date: Electronic Publishing committee
- Prev by thread: Re: ICSTI 2009 conference
- Next by thread: Report of * The G8 explicitly recognized the importance of datasharing issues
- Index(es):