[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: polarization
- To: imgcif-l@bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: polarization
- From: Jim Pflugrath <jwp@msc.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 08:54:58 -0500 (CDT)
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.95.1000911122422.503163A-100000@alf1.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk>
I use the polarization that Wolfgang Kabsch defined in his 1988 paper. It consists of the degree of polarization and a vector which defines a normal to the plane of polarization. So core CIF almost has it with this vector implicit. The vector is defined is terms of the lab coordinate system (remember the MSC system?). Jim > One thing I haven't seen in the imgCIF/CBF dictionary is a suitable data > item for the beam polarization - the core CIF item seems to be based on a > four-circle diffractometer equipped with a point detector, as the > polarization is referenced to "the normal to the diffraction plane of the > sample (i.e. the plane containing the incident and reflected beams)." > (from http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/cif/home.html#dics, section on > _diffrn_radiation_polarisn_ratio). > > Would it be more sensible in the case of area detectors to have a > definition based on "gravity" (or something more rigorous?). Yes, see above.
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: polarization (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- References:
- more CIF items to include... (Harry Powell)
- Prev by Date: more CIF items to include...
- Next by Date: Re: polarization
- Prev by thread: more CIF items to include...
- Next by thread: Re: polarization
- Index(es):