[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: Seattle Discussions
- To: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Seattle Discussions
- From: Yves Epelboin <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 08:00:28 -0400 (EDT)
>....
> Similarly, would it be possible to define a strict ordering of certain
> data items. I don't think this occurs in CIF, but it would make writing
> CBF software much easier if certain restrictions on the ordering of data
> items could be imposed. e.g. in the above example the
> '_array_intensities.offset' and '_array_intensities.scaling' could be
> restricted to occur only after the '_array_intensities.linearity' item
> has "introduced" them. Can these sort of restrictions be defined ?
> Or maybe there are better suggestions for how to enbody these requirements
> in a CIF format.
I am not a great specialist of CIF, however this restriction seems to be
against the spirit of CIF where it does not seem to me that the order is
important.
I fully agree that it would make the writing of software much easier but
future users might make mistakes because they would not understand the reason
for an order.
Thus I prefer more complexity for the writing of the software (not too much I
believe) and easier use later.
Andy's suggestion about the delimiters is fine to me.
Regards,
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
: Yves EPELBOIN :
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
: Lab. Mineralogie-Cristallographie, UA 09 CNRS, :
: Case 115, 4 place Jussieu :
: F-75252 PARIS CEDEX 05 :
: phone: 33 1 44 27 52 11 :
: Fax: 33 1 44 27 37 85 :
: E-Mail: [email protected] :
: WWW : http://www.lmcp.jussieu.fr/~epelboin :
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
: UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE PARIS FRANCE :
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: Re: Seattle Discussions
- Next by Date: Re: Seattle Discussions
- Prev by thread: Re: Seattle Discussions
- Next by thread: Re: Seattle Discussions
- Index(es):

