[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
[magCIF] DDLm for magCIF?
- To: "Discussion list for the magnetic CIF dictionary project (magcif@iucr.org)" <magcif@iucr.org>
- Subject: [magCIF] DDLm for magCIF?
- From: "Campbell, Branton" <branton@physics.byu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 04:08:55 +0000
- Accept-Language: en-US
Dear magCIF working group, I have started working on the magCIF data structure. In our list correspondence, there has been modest support for building the new dictionary using the new DDLm language. Shall I proceed to encourage others to assist us in pursuing this direction? Would the use of a new and somewhat untested dictionary language potentially slow the online availability of our dictionary on the IUCr website? On the COMCIFs mailing list, I found John Bollinger's suggestion of two parallel version (DDL1 and DDLm) interesting, at least for the sake of making DDL1-level auto-validation possible. Does this really matter to anyone? Best wishes, Branton **************************************** Branton J. Campbell, Professor Department of Physics & Astronomy Brigham Young University N261 ESC, BYU, Provo, UT 84602 Tel: 801-422-5758 Fax: 801-422-0553 Email: branton_campbell@byu.edu http://www.physics.byu.edu/faculty/campbell/ _______________________________________________ magCIF mailing list magCIF@iucr.org http://mailman.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/magcif
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: Re: [magCIF] magCIF working group
- Next by Date: [magCIF] MagCIF in Jana2006
- Prev by thread: Re: [magCIF] MagCIF in Jana2006
- Next by thread: [magCIF] magCIF working group
- Index(es):