[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
James.
[Send comment to list owner]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
[pdDMG] A definition for F_meas_squared for powder data
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: [pdDMG] A definition for F_meas_squared for powder data
- From: James Hester <[email protected]>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:43:43 +1100
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;bh=HQCyk6jw+WG5usp+ziHA4DX1Yud5og7LUXzWCAtrpuw=;b=LFu0iwu5yHjKO6bSDRrSIlljE5I4p9ESZt1AczDDxNWOSpyyxhJeqMF/qb1WAnO2GRkjkDUd0+eV+VzWjLE6TE/ZxeiWHEGtNJO/QTg/wK/QM5fPxe4vX0ZHPbmVw8fb8ypio0JY4JoTd+M+0EZGUjlYKDWCKxr+7F6PsjODajgcIuEOHk0wyZR4LG/BGFLftYWISQy3mFSMnbskfl4Y7Vz0cfc7J8dxN09pqsB6RCxPGQvJLAoKZZ2jh7VY5vICdPrcam6J8EGL0m+/XUFcRxnJOU5utgfIJyFHS6g1vIzCOXTT8Khp5EBV3UP0lUxxdfU1hz2MtvxggYQ4If2g1w==
Dear Powder Dictionary Management Group,
It is now recognised formally that CIF dictionaries may need to redefine datanames, and DDLm has been equipped with some facilities to handle this. In the case of the DDLm version of the powder dictionary, as far as I can tell the only two datanames from the core that are implicitly different are refln.F_complex and refln.F_meas_squared. _refln.F_complex is different purely because the phase id has to be considered when performing the calculation (unlike in the core case). _refln.F_meas_squared is different both because of the need to consider phase_id, but also because the procedure for calculating f_meas_squared from the powder histogram is completely different to the single crystal case. Could you all please consider what I have written below for F_meas_squared, and suggest any improvements. Ideally, the definition text should be clear enough for a programmer to implement the calculation.
It is now recognised formally that CIF dictionaries may need to redefine datanames, and DDLm has been equipped with some facilities to handle this. In the case of the DDLm version of the powder dictionary, as far as I can tell the only two datanames from the core that are implicitly different are refln.F_complex and refln.F_meas_squared. _refln.F_complex is different purely because the phase id has to be considered when performing the calculation (unlike in the core case). _refln.F_meas_squared is different both because of the need to consider phase_id, but also because the procedure for calculating f_meas_squared from the powder histogram is completely different to the single crystal case. Could you all please consider what I have written below for F_meas_squared, and suggest any improvements. Ideally, the definition text should be clear enough for a programmer to implement the calculation.
While I would appreciate feedback from at least some of you, if I don't hear from you within a week or so, I will assume that the definition below is adequate.
all the best,(New cif_pow definitions follow)
save_refln.F_complex
_definition.id '_refln.F_complex'
loop_
_alias.definition_id
'_refln.F_complex'
'_refln_F_complex'
_definition.update 2017-03-07
_description.text
;
The structure factor vector for the reflection calculated from
the atom site data for the phase given by phase_id.
;
_name.category_id refln
_name.object_id F_complex
_type.purpose Measurand
_type.source Derived
_type.container Single
_type.contents Complex
_enumeration.default 0.
loop_
_method.purpose
_method.expression
Definition
;
If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "neutron") _units.code = "femtometres"
Else If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "electron") _units.code = "volts"
Else _units.code = "electrons"
;
save_
save_refln.F_squared_meas
_definition.id '_refln.F_squared_meas'
loop_
_alias.definition_id
'_refln.F_meas'
'_refln_F_meas'
_definition.update 2017-03-07
_description.text
;
The structure factor amplitude for the reflection derived from a powder
histogram by partitioning observed intensity between peaks at each point
in the same proportion as the model peaks contribute to that point.
;
_name.category_id refln
_name.object_id F_squared_meas
_type.purpose Measurand
_type.source Derived
_type.container Single
_type.contents Real
_enumeration.default 0.
loop_
_method.purpose
_method.expression
Definition
;
If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "neutron") _units.code = "femtometres"
Else If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "electron") _units.code = "volts"
Else _units.code = "electrons"
;
save_
--
_definition.id '_refln.F_complex'
loop_
_alias.definition_id
'_refln.F_complex'
'_refln_F_complex'
_definition.update 2017-03-07
_description.text
;
The structure factor vector for the reflection calculated from
the atom site data for the phase given by phase_id.
;
_name.category_id refln
_name.object_id F_complex
_type.purpose Measurand
_type.source Derived
_type.container Single
_type.contents Complex
_enumeration.default 0.
loop_
_method.purpose
_method.expression
Definition
;
If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "neutron") _units.code = "femtometres"
Else If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "electron") _units.code = "volts"
Else _units.code = "electrons"
;
save_
save_refln.F_squared_meas
_definition.id '_refln.F_squared_meas'
loop_
_alias.definition_id
'_refln.F_meas'
'_refln_F_meas'
_definition.update 2017-03-07
_description.text
;
The structure factor amplitude for the reflection derived from a powder
histogram by partitioning observed intensity between peaks at each point
in the same proportion as the model peaks contribute to that point.
;
_name.category_id refln
_name.object_id F_squared_meas
_type.purpose Measurand
_type.source Derived
_type.container Single
_type.contents Real
_enumeration.default 0.
loop_
_method.purpose
_method.expression
Definition
;
If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "neutron") _units.code = "femtometres"
Else If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "electron") _units.code = "volts"
Else _units.code = "electrons"
;
save_
--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
_______________________________________________ pdDMG mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pddmg
[Send comment to list owner]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [pdDMG] A definition for F_meas_squared for powder data (James Hester)
- Prev by Date: Re: [pdDMG] DDLm pdCIF Issue 1: could detector and 2 theta offsetbe looped together in pd_calib?
- Next by Date: Re: [pdDMG] A definition for F_meas_squared for powder data
- Prev by thread: Re: [pdDMG] pdDMG Digest, Vol 4, Issue 2
- Next by thread: Re: [pdDMG] A definition for F_meas_squared for powder data
- Index(es):

