Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: spilt lists in DDL 1.4

On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 12:24 -0400, Brian Toby wrote:
> The more formality that CIF places on relationships between related 
> data items, the greater chance that someone will come up with a 
> crystallographically useful situation that breaks that relationship. To 
> treat the new paradigm, CIF will have to catch up (fast!) and define an 
> entirely new dictionary populated with previously-defined data items, 
> but having different relationships defined or define a entirely new set 
> of data items with definitions identical with existing items. In the 
> short term, data will be lost from the publication stream, because the 
> standard cannot accommodate it. Further, when there are too many ways 
> for the same information to be included in a CIF, the value of having a 
> standardized format diminishes because it becomes increasing difficult 
> for software to use that information.
> IMHO, go gently with formalizing data relationships.

I agree.  Fixing _atom_site_aniso_label would actually allow more
flexibility in data presentation (and catch up with general usage) in
this one case.   
cif-developers mailing list

Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Science Council (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ISC Committee on Data. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

International Science Council Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.