[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: CIF-JSON new draft
- Subject: Re: CIF-JSON new draft
- From: Marcin Wojdyr <wojdyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 09:24:15 +0100
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;bh=6zjuDE6pLDNd433JjbF/c9n320Be43VtNOFWFAehTKY=;b=tylhpPBRKRRhRWdi+9M4U/tfAdrIDwrTz2VrpEWFRsDeYRuOVu4eoAPDfZHv8ezNwJvoyrZ68ugNSmIr1B6YhI3PVKlCOEysUKjwLfyZTaeqGYRN40J8ZfM1UMa1tMKj+9Ral8JLy4YKfTT2iS9av2TFaWtIF4RLuNS3Z/n0RYxqu7NVdFvsKcezBGhTk8IH9q9OdyfHBaLVEsnRqUyCUDeasveYUFcqLFPXYtFJHZ4XJ23iHCYLsBdlAy4mkol2lV2ha68Hb8kwgkIFQm9QhuE2G5JPaLfT3lTtNkGWQT0rT5bgZ3fL2zFM7cbEf9+F1YniCNS2noEXgumPAHoERw==
- In-Reply-To: <CAM+dB2c-h9ZHMWiPhdfb4Hym4ynSVmS3_8B4QA777N_N9f4NDg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAM+dB2ey9kKLoZY=WE7Uy-fiWTGhQaFx7fcgODcYfhrNPwXkQw@mail.gmail.com><CACaHzQU-NPvorqZzARhnsTLaAU_tqpp9v56fJss9C9NG--ps0A@mail.gmail.com><MWHPR04MB051226521AF5A8F60AA4BC67E0140@MWHPR04MB0512.namprd04.prod.outlook.com><CACaHzQV8yQFetF-oLv6nhn6VtAjfkYUsNrgwjfCZoDo10Drh=w@mail.gmail.com><CAF_YUvUEOaCiPpoZ8d96HpxScgiJsGBQAO2RA7jVMFBUmWEU_w@mail.gmail.com><CACaHzQXZLL77jBMdKhfJHXg8JkxUkwH29MGKyGsYfdfK_2BABA@mail.gmail.com><CAF_YUvUeKG-WSf+yZuNtVUdDBd7Yn=_PnJOKYuzOJACff6V1SA@mail.gmail.com><CAM+dB2c-h9ZHMWiPhdfb4Hym4ynSVmS3_8B4QA777N_N9f4NDg@mail.gmail.com>
Bob: point taken, the difference is not significant here. What browserwas it, just for the record? James: if you do b.map(parseFloat)you're creating a second list. That's the main difference with Bob's benchmark. The simpler solution would be to just write in the spec that CIFnumbers can be represented either as strings or as numbers in JSON. Marcin_______________________________________________cif-developers mailing listcif-developers@iucr.orghttp://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CIF-JSON new draft (Robert Hanson)
- References:
- CIF-JSON new draft (James Hester)
- Re: CIF-JSON new draft (Marcin Wojdyr)
- RE: CIF-JSON new draft (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: CIF-JSON new draft (Marcin Wojdyr)
- Re: CIF-JSON new draft (Robert Hanson)
- Re: CIF-JSON new draft (Marcin Wojdyr)
- Re: CIF-JSON new draft (Robert Hanson)
- Re: CIF-JSON new draft (James Hester)
- Prev by Date: Re: CIF-JSON new draft
- Next by Date: Re: CIF-JSON new draft
- Prev by thread: Re: CIF-JSON new draft
- Next by thread: Re: CIF-JSON new draft
- Index(es):