[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
--
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15
- Subject: Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15
- From: Robert Hanson <hansonr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 13:16:13 -0500
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stolaf.edu; s=stolaf;h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;bh=HuJ5ryKx5o8q/72j4UPwstQ9VbeYizf4ac7+4boZjhc=;b=VHVnenfe+vbBOQe2VpGEYs2mVHHpBKxo+zW7tp6HRuWlW2mwQNMxshj/mGH8ISHuE9xaz0SFHFOD8Glw8W7VrK+pmU/8vlpL0Fx6KK3NZooreMeQ80Rdef1WYcA/2v6JBO7c/6yV0nhEvntuiAIgJP4PQg9sQnaO/uISEL6EX9I=
- In-Reply-To: <CAF_YUvXPj9g6CEnsKmwZwrp7p550nyykrnQY9iN5wpEnDzrrYQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAM+dB2cAAY3CjC741WU0GqaWmAi2iGHtwZ82iA1bCwuNoG6nQg@mail.gmail.com><CAF_YUvVa0JXgAN9Bec6fjd6Nmco5W7EHWLN=Ba=daRR9U-2PzQ@mail.gmail.com><CACaHzQVYeOfS9zTe4gDJMVNCTgxtat0zhMAd2EMX=etXj5g2Gw@mail.gmail.com><CAF_YUvWV3huhwoBuCOkKXqCcYH+8kjFCPjoa=j_v61JC4H32Jg@mail.gmail.com><CAF_YUvUMbVz2j5=XXD5WD3G+0XB4tY=r1zwXuADB14qQNZTPvg@mail.gmail.com><CAF_YUvXPj9g6CEnsKmwZwrp7p550nyykrnQY9iN5wpEnDzrrYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Two points:
1. I do not understand the stripping of "data_" and "save_" from the names we have for these.
1. I do not understand the stripping of "data_" and "save_" from the names we have for these.
2. Save frames. What is the problem with just doing this?
"data_another_block":{
"_abc":["xyz"],
"save_internal":{"_abc":["yzx"],
"_r.fruit":["apple","pear"],
"_r.colour":["red","green"]}
},
}
That is, why the special "frames" list?
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Robert Hanson <hansonr@stolaf.edu> wrote:
2) list item names need not be lower-case, right? Nothing I see in CIF says that they conform to the requirements of data names. Thus, CIF2 could have upper- and lower-case names in list items.Two questions arising:1) CIF2 mentions byte order. This would be the (optional) first two characters of the data stream?--On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Robert Hanson <hansonr@stolaf.edu> wrote:I have several friendly suggestions. I think the way to do this is to just give you a link to a Google Doc that has my suggested changes made in it, and let you react to that.I think this one is going to take some more elaboration:Entries at the same position in JSON list datavalues correspond to one another if the datanames belong to the same category.
BobRobert M. Hanson
Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.
-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
--
Robert M. Hanson
Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.
-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.
-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
_______________________________________________ cif-developers mailing list cif-developers@iucr.org http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15 (James Hester)
- Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15 (Robert Hanson)
- References:
- CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15 (James Hester)
- Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15 (Robert Hanson)
- Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15 (Marcin Wojdyr)
- Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15 (Robert Hanson)
- Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15 (Robert Hanson)
- Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15 (Robert Hanson)
- Prev by Date: Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15
- Next by Date: Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15
- Prev by thread: Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15
- Next by thread: Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15
- Index(es):