[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
--
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15
- Subject: Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15
- From: James Hester <jamesrhester@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 09:27:29 +1000
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;bh=kJCKc6NyBeQAA80wtCb6Uys/vM2WSqLM2cWpR7o8Nb0=;b=gmHIL5K60sHP4pu68vOKEQzDMSubi7UCIZBjD7bQamz1ddSwKELe6p1UNuYpZSvf+bcOW17ZseUGuo4tX0sRZ5yCtD4/H1d16ghnyiSSsIq5xoYEAgFA7qHzL0C1NiI4lmVwA27fcFW/W6++Psr0EDI0o9cETZEpGvR+DWlZCU0E93wP//kdDKFWsOlTaRawRGjDDCXOXuod/W6ma5kPuWVFV1AtYsZa4Kb5IkVkJzPPsGxvooIIxIZfZb59grjYYHvuGnsTXK1TvsgQWgpO24YARTH+3sttcfzHe9gAvWUMDpvU4vyWtAf5NUXhHNtzT9EnrzrH+lXr7sVlGI1PRg==
- In-Reply-To: <CAF_YUvUMbVz2j5=XXD5WD3G+0XB4tY=r1zwXuADB14qQNZTPvg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAM+dB2cAAY3CjC741WU0GqaWmAi2iGHtwZ82iA1bCwuNoG6nQg@mail.gmail.com><CAF_YUvVa0JXgAN9Bec6fjd6Nmco5W7EHWLN=Ba=daRR9U-2PzQ@mail.gmail.com><CACaHzQVYeOfS9zTe4gDJMVNCTgxtat0zhMAd2EMX=etXj5g2Gw@mail.gmail.com><CAF_YUvWV3huhwoBuCOkKXqCcYH+8kjFCPjoa=j_v61JC4H32Jg@mail.gmail.com><CAF_YUvUMbVz2j5=XXD5WD3G+0XB4tY=r1zwXuADB14qQNZTPvg@mail.gmail.com>
On 16 May 2017 at 03:30, Robert Hanson <hansonr@stolaf.edu> wrote:
I have several friendly suggestions. I think the way to do this is to just give you a link to a Google Doc that has my suggested changes made in it, and let you react to that.I think this one is going to take some more elaboration:Entries at the same position in JSON list datavalues correspond to one another if the datanames belong to the same category.
Yes, I had trouble expressing this concisely but clearly. It is merely a statement of the obvious, that values in the same row of a CIF loop belong together. This is not normally expressed explicitly as we all know how to interpret a table. A somewhat more precise statement would be "The value at position n of a JSON list datavalue for a dataname belonging to category C corresponds to the value(s) at position n of the JSON list datavalue(s) of the key dataname(s) of category C".
I thought it best to add this in as, having removed the visual tabulation provided by CIF loops, there is no longer a strong implication that values at the same position in the lists belong together. Can you or anybody suggest a more understandable form of text?
Bob
_______________________________________________
cif-developers mailing list
cif-developers@iucr.org
http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cif- developers
--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
_______________________________________________ cif-developers mailing list cif-developers@iucr.org http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15 (James Hester)
- Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15 (Robert Hanson)
- Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15 (Marcin Wojdyr)
- Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15 (Robert Hanson)
- Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15 (Robert Hanson)
- Prev by Date: Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15
- Next by Date: Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15
- Prev by thread: Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-15
- Next by thread: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-08
- Index(es):