[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
- From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <yaya@bernstein-plus-sons.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:02:57 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <20091201105503.GE20378@emerald.iucr.org>
- References: <C7398588.126B6%nick@csse.uwa.edu.au><275884.79342.qm@web87006.mail.ird.yahoo.com><84104.25546.qm@web87002.mail.ird.yahoo.com><753987.29972.qm@web87006.mail.ird.yahoo.com><279aad2a0911302156m7645df42r171e4b2291c99abc@mail.gmail.com><20091201105503.GE20378@emerald.iucr.org>
Dear Colleagues, I am also concerned about Nick's statement. I believe that it has set this group off in an unfortunate direction. I would like to suggest that each of us, including Nick, simply express what they individually believe will produce the most useful and coherent CIF2 specification with whatever technical reasons are behind it and not adopt rigid "non-negotiable" positions. I do not see how allowing the quote and double quote in non-delimited strings after the first character impedes the creation of recursive data structures any more than the apperance of single quote in a double quoted string or a double quote in a single quoted string would impede the creation of recursive data structures. Regards, Herbert ===================================================== Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121 Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769 +1-631-244-3035 yaya@dowling.edu ===================================================== On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Brian McMahon wrote: > I want to vote "For" on this proposition, but I'm concerned by Nick's > assertion of 9 October > http://www.iucr.org/__data/iucr/lists/ddlm-group/msg00038.html > > (1) restricting the character set of non-delimited strings is > NON-NEGOTIABLE. If we don't restrict it, then we can't build > recursive data structures and exploit DDLm. > > I understood this to be definitely ruling out the embedding of the > quote characters in non-delimited strings, but I've lost track of the > details of the subsequent discussions. > > Regards > Brian > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 04:56:52PM +1100, James Hester wrote: >> *NOTE REQUEST FOR VOTE BELOW* >> >> Simon: From reading your previous emails, I'm guessing that the source of >> your concern is that the possible characterset of non-delimited strings >> appears more restrictive than is strictly necessary. In particular, you're >> not sure why we have excluded quote and double quote from non-delimited >> strings. >> >> You are correct that the other CIF2 syntax does not require that quote or >> double quote are excluded from non-delimited strings (apart from the first >> character, of course). The exclusion of the quote/double quote was on >> general principle of keeping all characters that serve as delimiters out of >> non-delimited strings, even if those characters could never cause confusion. >> It also has the benefit of allowing some syntax errors to be picked up. >> >> Nick is with me in Sydney, and we have decided that this is the sort of >> issue that we just have to vote on, as the arguments either way are not >> conclusive. >> >> I would therefore call everybody to vote on the following proposition: >> >> "That <quote> and <double quote> may appear in non-delimited strings, as >> long as they are not the first character" >> >> Voting so far: >> >> Against: Nick >> For: James >> Agnostic: ? >> >> -- >> T +61 (02) 9717 9907 >> F +61 (02) 9717 3145 >> M +61 (04) 0249 4148 > _______________________________________________ > ddlm-group mailing list > ddlm-group@iucr.org > http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group > _______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- Re: [ddlm-group] Space as a list item separator (Nick Spadaccini)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Space as a list item separator (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Space as a list item separator (SIMON WESTRIP)
- [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF (Brian McMahon)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Stakeholders
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] CIF 1.5
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
- Index(es):