[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: Joe Krahn <krahn@niehs.nih.gov>
To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
Sent: Friday, 4 December, 2009 17:49:01
Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
The summary did not include a rationale for all of the quotation rule
changes, which is the area that makes the least sense to me.
The section defining the rationale for not allowing lexical characters
outside the 7-bit range (the first Reasoning paragraph) might mention
that it affords faster parsing by deferring any UTF-8 conversions.
I see that the commas were left out of the list syntax. It may be good
to put a short paragraph about the alternative comma-delimited syntax,
so that other people reviewing the proposal have a chance to comment.
Thanks,
Joe Krahn
_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
ddlm-group@iucr.org
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] Summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
- From: SIMON WESTRIP <simonwestrip@btinternet.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:13:24 +0000 (GMT)
- In-Reply-To: <4B194B8D.5050806@niehs.nih.gov>
- References: <20091204093823.GA10999@emerald.iucr.org><4B194B8D.5050806@niehs.nih.gov>
I agree that a "rationale for all of the quotation rule
changes" might be welcome - I can imagine that at first glance many people
will wonder what the """ and ''' are for.
I'm not sure that hinting that comma-separated lists
are also a possibilty is going to help matters?
Afterall, when it comes down to it, until there are
dictionaries that comply to CIF2, many disciplines
that already make use of CIF will find it difficult to
adopt CIF2 because their current dictionaries will be invalidated by
the restrictions on the dataname character set?
Cheers
Simon
changes" might be welcome - I can imagine that at first glance many people
will wonder what the """ and ''' are for.
I'm not sure that hinting that comma-separated lists
are also a possibilty is going to help matters?
Afterall, when it comes down to it, until there are
dictionaries that comply to CIF2, many disciplines
that already make use of CIF will find it difficult to
adopt CIF2 because their current dictionaries will be invalidated by
the restrictions on the dataname character set?
Cheers
Simon
From: Joe Krahn <krahn@niehs.nih.gov>
To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
Sent: Friday, 4 December, 2009 17:49:01
Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
The summary did not include a rationale for all of the quotation rule
changes, which is the area that makes the least sense to me.
The section defining the rationale for not allowing lexical characters
outside the 7-bit range (the first Reasoning paragraph) might mention
that it affords faster parsing by deferring any UTF-8 conversions.
I see that the commas were left out of the list syntax. It may be good
to put a short paragraph about the alternative comma-delimited syntax,
so that other people reviewing the proposal have a chance to comment.
Thanks,
Joe Krahn
_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
ddlm-group@iucr.org
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
_______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [ddlm-group] Summary of proposed CIF syntax changes (Brian McMahon)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Summary of proposed CIF syntax changes (Joe Krahn)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Elide close quotes by doubling?
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
- Index(es):