[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
[ddlm-group] Data names
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: [ddlm-group] Data names
- From: Joe Krahn <krahn@niehs.nih.gov>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:04:54 -0500
When I first read the spec for STAR, my view was that the leading underscore for data item names is a prefix, the same as "data_" is a prefix and not part of the data block name. Obviously, CIF has taken the approach that the underscore is part of the name, so the leading underscores are everywhere, and not just in the CIF data-name tokens. The CIF approach is unlikely to change, but perhaps dREL expressions would be easier to read if the leading underscore was optional. The relevance here is that this idea would require restrictions on the first character following the underscore not being a 2nd underscore. Also, some implementations may want to treat the period like a structure member access. If so, should the period require adjacent non-period characters? For example, should these be allowed: a...b . .. I assume that these should be allowed, but perhaps it could cause problems in dREL? Thanks, Joe _______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ddlm-group] Data names (Nick Spadaccini)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Revised version of syntax change summary document
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Data names
- Index(es):