Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ddlm-group] LOOP versus LIST

  • To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
  • Subject: [ddlm-group] LOOP versus LIST
  • From: Joe Krahn <krahn@niehs.nih.gov>
  • Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:41:16 -0500
I assume that a list of items defined via a loop is distinct from a list 
of items defined by a list. Is that correct?

Likewise, is a list of one item distinct from a scalar value?

Currently, CIF files don't differentiate between a one-element loop and 
a scalar. For example, RCSB components.cif does not use loops for atom 
data when there is only one atom. Is this stated anywhere?

Also, is an empty string a valid TABLE index? Other CIF names require at 
least one character, but my understanding is that a TABLE index is any 
valid string, which includes an empty string. Strings are also 
case-sensitive, so I assume that TABLE indices are also case-sensitive.

Joe Krahn
ddlm-group mailing list

Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Science Council (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ISC Committee on Data. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

International Science Council Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.