[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] CIF2 Syntax all wrapped up?
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] CIF2 Syntax all wrapped up?
- From: Nick Spadaccini <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:57:47 +0800
- Authentication-Results: postfix;
- In-Reply-To: <4B32685C.firstname.lastname@example.org>
This is example is made more convoluted by including , in lists, which have no meaning. If I recall correctly we agreed on space delimited list values. If we stick to that then the confusions below disappear. It also removes the dangling comma and double comma problem. The parsing with a compound data type is exactly the same as outside a compound data type (hence you can build a simpler recursive descent parser). The correct definition of the list below is [1 #one 2 #two 3 #three 4 #four ] Which is the list [1 2 3 4] with embedded comments #one #two #three and #four. The list below is (I add the quotes for clarity) ["1,#one" "2," 3 ",4"] with the embedded quotes #two #three and #four On 24/12/09 2:58 AM, "Joe Krahn" <email@example.com> wrote: > James Hester wrote: >> I would answer as follows: > ... >> 2) What are the rules for comments within lists and tables? >> >> I would treat them as whitespace > One detail is whether the "#" starting a comment requires preceding > whitespace. Herbert's example is: > > [1,#one > 2, #two > 3 #three > ,4 #four > ] > > He suggests that preceding whitespace is there only if needed to > terminate the preceding token, and not a requirement in the actual > comment syntax. This looks OK in the above example, but may not be clear > after a quoted string: > "string"#comment > > Or, perhaps this is no less clear than the lack of whitespace in a list: > ["string"] > > >> 4) Why require single or double quotes for table index strings, rather >> than just follow the normal quoting rules? >> >> >> No good reason - so let's just follow the normal rules. >> > Should quotes be requires at all for the index string? Correct parsing > only requires quotes if the index string contains a colon. In the > current draft, that is imposed for all strings, not just table-index > strings. So, there is no need to mandate quotes here, unless the global > requirement to quote strings with : is dropped. > > Maybe the intention was to disallow multi-line index strings? > > >> Some of these are more technical details compared to the other issues. >> These came up while I was working on a big CIF2 regular-expression, >> where parsing details have to be considered more carefully. >> >> Actually, it would be rather good if you could post these regular >> expressions once we have a final specification, as they are likely to be >> useful to a broad audience. > I plan to do that. To be fully functional, it has to be done in Perl > syntax, which has a feature that allows recursion for table and list > values. Despite that caveat, it will be useful even where the full > recursive expression will not work. > > Joe > _______________________________________________ > ddlm-group mailing list > firstname.lastname@example.org > http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group cheers Nick -------------------------------- Associate Professor N. Spadaccini, PhD School of Computer Science & Software Engineering The University of Western Australia t: +61 (0)8 6488 3452 35 Stirling Highway f: +61 (0)8 6488 1089 CRAWLEY, Perth, WA 6009 AUSTRALIA w3: www.csse.uwa.edu.au/~nick MBDP M002 CRICOS Provider Code: 00126G e: Nick.Spadaccini@uwa.edu.au _______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list email@example.com http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- [ddlm-group] A final non-delimited string definition. (Nick Spadaccini)
- Re: [ddlm-group] CIF2 Syntax all wrapped up? (Joe Krahn)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Comments and folding within lists and tables
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] LOOP versus LIST
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] CIF2 Syntax all wrapped up?
- Next by thread: [ddlm-group] A final non-delimited string definition.