[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on BOM

• To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on BOM
• From: David Brown <[email protected]>
• Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:47:16 -0400
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]><[email protected]>

Title:

The purpose of this email is to say that I have been following the discusion with interest and have learned a lot from reading all the comments, but I am we;; out of my area of expertize and I do not feel qualified to vote.  I like the idea that CIF2 should be a text standard rather than a binary file as this is more in line with our original philosophy, but I am unable to make the choice between Jame's options. David

begin:vcard
fn:I.David Brown
n:Brown;I.David
org:McMaster University;Brockhouse Institute for Materials Research
adr:;;King St. W;Hamilton;Ontario;L8S 4M1;Canada
email;internet:[email protected]
title:Professor Emeritus
tel;work:+905 525 9140 x 24710
tel;fax:+905 521 2773
version:2.1
end:vcard

_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
[email protected]
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group

Reply to: [list | sender only]

• References:
  • [ddlm-group] Vote on BOM (James Hester)
  • Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on BOM (Brian McMahon)
  • Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on BOM (Herbert J. Bernstein)
  • Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on BOM (James Hester)

• Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on BOM
• Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] options/text vs binary/end-of-line. .
• Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on BOM
• Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on BOM
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread