[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .
- From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <[email protected]>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:16:50 -0400 (EDT)
- In-Reply-To: <8F77913624F7524AACD2A92EAF3BFA5416659DEDF4@SJMEMXMBS11.stjude.sjcrh.local>
- References: <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><a06240804c8ca43f92cc2@[192.168.2.104]><[email protected]><8F77913624F7524AACD2A92EAF3BFA5416659DEDF4@SJMEMXMBS11.stjude.sjcrh.local>
You must, of course, quote all pluses not being used as a
concatenation operator.
=====================================================
Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769
+1-631-244-3035
[email protected]
=====================================================
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Bollinger, John C wrote:
> On Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:18 AM, SIMON WESTRIP wrote:
>
>> First thought is how does this work in loops?
>>
>> loop_ _item
>> 'abc' + 'def'
>
> One specific (but synthetic) example I was thinking of was along the same lines:
>
> loop_
> _amino_acid.code
> _amino_acid.optical_rotation_direction
> 'ALA' +
> 'ARG' +
> 'LEU' -
>
>> But I need to check whether + is one of the characters that is not allowed to start a
>> non-delimited string...
>
> It is not. Those are " ' _ $ [ {
> If the proposal is adopted then adding + to that list would reduce the added complications for parsing. That would be incompatible with using the optional leading + with numeric values, however.
>
>> Otherwise I see no reason not to explore this.
>
> I see no reason at all not to explore it. Notwithstanding the above, I have not yet formed an opinion on this question.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> John
> --
> John C. Bollinger, Ph.D.
> Department of Structural Biology
> St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
>
>
> Email Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer
> _______________________________________________
> ddlm-group mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
>
_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
[email protected]
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. . (Nick Spadaccini)
- References:
- [ddlm-group] import and loops in ddlm (David Brown)
- Re: [ddlm-group] import and loops in ddlm (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] import and loops in ddlm (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] import and loops in ddlm (James Hester)
- [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. . (Bollinger, John C)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .
- Index(es):

