[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator. .

To: "'Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries'" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator. .
From: "Bollinger, John C" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:44:18 -0500
Accept-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

I vote no.

John

John C. Bollinger, Ph.D.

Department of Structural Biology

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Hester
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 12:02 AM
To: ddlm-group
Subject: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator. .

Dear DDLm group members,

It appears that we have exhausted the discussion on the pros and cons of a concatenation operator. I'd therefore like to call for a vote on the following:

"That a datavalue concatenation operator be added to the CIF2 syntax. The concatenation operator shall be a single underscore, placed between the two datavalues to be concatenated and separated from each of them by whitespace. The concatenation operator may only be used to concatenate delimited datavalues."

James.
--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148

Email Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer

_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
[email protected]
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group

Reply to: [list | sender only]

References:

[ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator (James Hester)

Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator

Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator

Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator

Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator

Index(es):

Date

Thread

Discussion List Archives

Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator. .