[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
- From: David Brown <[email protected]>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:42:41 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
I do not feel strongly on this question, but have no objection to
the motion. David James Hester wrote: Dear DDLm group members, |
begin:vcard fn:I.David Brown n:Brown;I.David org:McMaster University;Brockhouse Institute for Materials Research adr:;;King St. W;Hamilton;Ontario;L8S 4M1;Canada email;internet:[email protected] title:Professor Emeritus tel;work:+905 525 9140 x 24710 tel;fax:+905 521 2773 version:2.1 end:vcard
_______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list [email protected] http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator (James Hester)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator. .
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator. .
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
- Index(es):