[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator

I vote against, at this stage, on the ground that it breaks basic STAR
syntax and thus uncouples CIF from STAR, without to me a compelling
advantage.

Regards
Brian

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:01:30PM +1100, James Hester wrote:
> Dear DDLm group members,
> 
> It appears that we have exhausted the discussion on the pros and cons of a
> concatenation operator.  I'd therefore like to call for a vote on the
> following:
> 
> "That a datavalue concatenation operator be added to the CIF2 syntax.  The
> concatenation operator shall be a single underscore, placed between the two
> datavalues to be concatenated and separated from each of them by
> whitespace.  The concatenation operator may only be used to concatenate
> delimited datavalues."
> 
> James.
> -- 
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148

> _______________________________________________
> ddlm-group mailing list
> ddlm-group@iucr.org
> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group

_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
ddlm-group@iucr.org
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group

Reply to: [list | sender only]