[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fwd: Correction to list item]

• To: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
• Subject: [Fwd: Correction to list item]
• From: Howard Flack <[email protected]>
• Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 14:19:40 GMT

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--Boundary_(ID_Zz6biCmUyhoUjVR8DusEYw)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit


-- 
Howard Flack        http://www.unige.ch/crystal/ahdf/Howard.Flack.html
Laboratoire de Cristallographie               Phone: 41 (22) 702 62 49
24 quai Ernest-Ansermet             mailto:[email protected]
CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland                   Fax: 41 (22) 702 61 08

--Boundary_(ID_Zz6biCmUyhoUjVR8DusEYw)
Content-type: message/rfc822

Return-path: <[email protected]>
Received: from gate.unige.ch ([129.194.8.77])
 by mbx.unige.ch (PMDF V6.0-24 #44959)
 with ESMTP id <[email protected]> for [email protected]
 (ORCPT [email protected]); Mon, 08 Jan 2001 15:16:35 +0100 (MET)
Received: from DIRECTORY-DAEMON.gate.unige.ch by gate.unige.ch
 (PMDF V6.0-24 #44959) id <[email protected]> for
 [email protected] (ORCPT [email protected]); Mon,
 08 Jan 2001 15:16:35 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mails.dtic.mil (mails.dtic.mil [131.84.1.19])
 by gate.unige.ch (PMDF V6.0-24 #44959)
 with ESMTP id <[email protected]> for [email protected];
 Mon, 08 Jan 2001 15:16:35 +0100 (MET)
Received: from list.dtic.mil (list.dtic.mil [131.84.105.11])
	by mails.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/990419cac) with ESMTP id JAA27184; Mon,
 08 Jan 2001 09:16:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from list (list.dtic.mil [172.16.105.11])
	by list.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/1.0) with ESMTP id JAA28581; Mon,
 08 Jan 2001 09:15:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from DTIC.MIL by DTIC.MIL (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d)
 with spool id 3461 for [email protected]; Mon, 08 Jan 2001 09:15:35 -0500
Received: from mails.dtic.mil (mails.dtic.mil [131.84.1.19])
 by list.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/1.0) with ESMTP id QAA23719 for
 <[email protected]>; Sat, 06 Jan 2001 16:14:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from kang.tinet.ie (mail1.tinet.ie [159.134.237.19])
 by mails.dtic.mil (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/990419cac) with ESMTP id QAA12221 for
 <[email protected]>; Sat, 06 Jan 2001 16:14:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from p10.as1.bantry1.eircom.net ([159.134.209.10] helo=eircom.net)
 by kang.tinet.ie with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #23)
 id 14F0fB-0000BP-00 for [email protected]; Sat, 06 Jan 2001 21:14:09 +0000
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 20:33:28 +0100
From: Barry Mahon <[email protected]>
Subject: Correction to list item
Sender: ICSTI-L list <[email protected]>
Approved-by: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Reply-to: ICSTI-L list <[email protected]>
Message-id: <[email protected]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD47  (Win98; I)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: en
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

I have received the following correction to the item posted by Stephanie
on my behalf last week.

> From: "Gelsinger, Patrick P" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: IBM and Intel push copy protection ... (Gilmore, RISKS-21.17)
>
>   [Received via Dave Farber, whom Patrick had requested to post a correction.]
>
> Content protection technology misinformation generates negative web-press
> coverage:
>
> An article on *The Register* website "Stealth plan puts copy protection into
> every hard drive" contains false information that the 4C's (Intel, IBM, MEI,
> Toshiba) Content Protection for Recordable Media (CPRM) is to be applied to
> all PC hard drives.  It is misinterpreting a specification for use of CPRM
> with the Compact Flash media format (which supports either semiconductor
> flash memory or IBM microdrives) probably because Compact Flash uses the
> same command protocol interface as standard PC harddrives.  The technology
> is neither intended nor licensed for use with PC harddrives and is optional
> even for the supported media types (flash memory and microdrives). John
> Gilmore, a noted privacy and consumer advocate, has picked up the article
> and further propagated the erroneous information and mentioned Intel
> "IBM&Intel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives".  I have alerted
> public relations at Intel and are disseminating accurate information within
> Intel and among our industry contacts.
>

Bye, Barry

--Boundary_(ID_Zz6biCmUyhoUjVR8DusEYw)--

Reply to: [list | sender only]

• Prev by Date: RE: Ingenta/ICSTI Study
• Next by Date: [Fwd: FYI: FIZ Karlsruhe to Launch Free Sci Tech Service Across the
• Prev by thread: [Fwd: FYI: FIZ Karlsruhe to Launch Free Sci Tech Service Across the
• Next by thread: RE: Ingenta/ICSTI Study
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread