Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

ICSTI: Bundled Subscriptions - the debate

  • To: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
  • Subject: ICSTI: Bundled Subscriptions - the debate
  • From: Pete Strickland <[email protected]>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:48:48 +0100 (BST)


----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Received: from list.dtic.mil (list.dtic.mil [131.84.105.11])
	by agate.iucr.ac.uk (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g8NALsG03854;
	Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:21:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from list (list.dtic.mil [172.16.105.11])
	by list.dtic.mil (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8NAFRR24917;
	Mon, 23 Sep 2002 06:15:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DTIC.MIL by DTIC.MIL (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool
          id 113534 for [email protected]; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 06:15:27 -0400
Approved-By: [email protected]
Received: from dtics22.dtic.mil (dtics22.dtic.mil [131.84.1.29]) by
          list.dtic.mil (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8M9qUR17377 for
          <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 05:52:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mails.dtic.mil ([131.84.1.19]) by dtics22.dtic.mil (NAVGW
          2.5.2.12) with SMTP id M2002092205523001181 for
          <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 05:52:30 -0400
Received: from mail02.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net
          (mail02.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.18]) by 
mails.dtic.mil
          (8.11.6+Sun/8.10.2/990419cac) with SMTP id g8M9qT526298 for
          <[email protected]>; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 05:52:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 89380 messnum 73402 invoked from
          network[159.134.212.11/p212-11.as1.bay.bantry.eircom.net]); 22 Sep
          2002 09:52:11 -0000
Received: from p212-11.as1.bay.bantry.eircom.net (HELO your-z3mdcejeuo)
          (159.134.212.11) by mail02.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 89380) with
          SMTP; 22 Sep 2002 09:52:11 -0000
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="windows-1252"
X-Mailer: Opera 6.04 build 1135
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mails.dtic.mil id
                      g8M9qU526299
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by list.dtic.mil id
                      g8M9qUR17378
Message-ID:  <KHUODA98PN1Z7YW74VSGDVQXRYSSPTP.3d8d9294@your-z3mdcejeuo>
Date:         Sun, 22 Sep 2002 10:51:16 +0100
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: ICSTI-L list <[email protected]>
From: Barry Mahon <[email protected]>
Subject: Bundled Subscriptions - the debate
To: [email protected]
Precedence: list
Content-Length: 2873
Status: R 
X-Status: N
Dear All,

In my message of last week about the Chronicle of Higher Education article

�Second Thoughts on 'Bundled' E-Journals -
Librarians' skepticism grows on colleges' agreements with Elsevier�

There was a live discussion on Thursday last;

The transcript of the discussion is at:

http://chronicle.com/colloquylive/2002/09/ejournal/

To whet your appetite, here is an extract.....

Question from Andrew Gordon-Brown, JP Morgan, publishing analyst:

1. What is it about the STM market where an academic scholar signs away the
rights to his/her research for nothing and then the commercial publisher
 sells it back to the very same intstitution making a 40% operating margin in
 the process? 2. Where does the value lie in the journal publishing process?
 THe commercial publishers would have you believe it's in the peer review
 process and in the value added web-based services. Is this true?
3. Why do research universities not change the way they incentivise their
scholars? As long as research grants and career promotion are dependent on
getting articles published in expensive journals, nothing will change.
4. Will universities genuinely not renew their contracts with Elsevier
 Science or is this just hot air? Which universities believe they can make
 savings and how much?

Kenneth L. Frazier: [Director of the library system at the University of
 Wisconsin at Madison, the guest in the discussion]

1. The custom of giving away one's articles for publishing, and sometimes
 even paying for the privledge of publishing one's journal, is a long
 standing custom of academe, not just for science, technology, and medicine
 (STM). From the author's point of view, the value is in being published in a
 pretigious journal. The extremely high cost of research journals is a
 relatively new thing. We're just now getting to the point of realizing that
 academe can't afford this system any long. 2. The value is in the reputation
 of the journal title, which comes from the peer review process. Journals
 actually don't provide peer review; the academic colleagues of the author
 provide that review, often for free. And, publishers aren't the only
 institutions capable of providing web-based access to articles. My point is
 that an alternative model is possible.
3. I agree. those changes are beginning to take place in the academic
community. That is, faculty members are being recognized for publishing and
disseminating knowledge in new ways. Another hopeful sign is that many
university administrators, provosts, and presidents are beginning to call for
 such change in the academic culture.
4. It's a mystery to me; I just don't know. My guess is that university
 libraries that have rapidly growing budgets will continue to buy the bundled
 products. And only those universities facing severe budget challenges will
 be able to begin moving away from the old publishing model.

-------------------------------------------------------

-- 

Best wishes

Peter Strickland
Managing Editor
IUCr Journals

----------------------------------------------------------------------
IUCr Editorial Office, 5 Abbey Square, Chester CH1 2HU, England
Phone: 44 1244 342878   Fax: 44 1244 314888   Email: [email protected]
Ftp: ftp.iucr.org   WWW: http://journals.iucr.org/

NEWSFLASH: Complete text of all IUCr journals back to 1948 
now online! Visit Crystallography Journals Online for more details

Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Science Council (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ISC Committee on Data. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

International Science Council Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.

Useful links