[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

ICSTI: Opinion on A&I services and Open Access

• To: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
• Subject: ICSTI: Opinion on A&I services and Open Access
• From: Pete Strickland <[email protected]>
• Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:46:55 GMT

----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Received: from list.dtic.mil (list.dtic.mil [131.84.105.11])
	by agate.iucr.ac.uk (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h0SBRd119284;
	Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:27:40 GMT
Received: from list (list.dtic.mil [172.16.105.11])
	by list.dtic.mil (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0SBP9N04297;
	Tue, 28 Jan 2003 06:25:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from DTIC.MIL by DTIC.MIL (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool
          id 23497 for [email protected]; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 06:25:09 -0500
Approved-By: [email protected]
Received: from dtics22.dtic.mil (dtics22.dtic.mil [131.84.1.29]) by
          list.dtic.mil (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with SMTP id h0S9HoN21697 for
          <[email protected]>; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:17:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mails.dtic.mil ([131.84.1.19]) by dtics22.dtic.mil (NAVGW
          2.5.2.12) with SMTP id M2003012804175030427 for
          <[email protected]>; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:17:50 -0500
Received: from mel-rto3.wanadoo.fr (smtp-out-3.wanadoo.fr [193.252.19.233]) by
          mails.dtic.mil (8.11.6+Sun/8.10.2/990419cac) with SMTP id
          h0S9Hod01954 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:17:50 -0500
          (EST)
Received: from mel-rta9.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.69) by mel-rto3.wanadoo.fr
          (6.7.015) id 3E0C33B50135BC14 for [email protected]; Tue, 28 Jan 2003
          10:17:49 +0100
Received: from your-z3mdcejeuo (193.248.87.124) by mel-rta9.wanadoo.fr
          (6.7.015) id 3E26DA8D006B622F for [email protected]; Tue, 28 Jan 2003
          10:17:49 +0100
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="windows-1252"
X-Mailer: Opera 6.05 build 1140
Message-ID:  <YVRLGRYTDBYT7608CRNMOJIFLJOM.3e36488f@your-z3mdcejeuo>
Date:         Tue, 28 Jan 2003 09:08:31 -0000
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: ICSTI-L list <[email protected]>
From: Barry Mahon <[email protected]>
Subject: Opinion on A&I services and Open Access
To: [email protected]
Precedence: list
X-UIDL: T)N"!m3V!!`pK!!MG@"!
Status: R 
X-Status: N
An extract from the September 98 Forum, the list about Open Access:
>Date:    Mon, 27 Jan 2003 21:57:59 +0000

From:    Stevan Harnad <[email protected]>

>Subject: Open Access and Abstract/Indexing Services
>
>Query from [identity removed]:

Thank you for your continued and vigorous discussion on the current state of
journal publishing.  I am curious if you've published or presented an opinion
 on abstract and indexing services such as (the non-profit) BIOSIS and on
 online services such as (the for-profit) Web of Science/Knowledge (etc). 
 Could you direct me to that position statement?  If you have no stated
 position on such services, have you encountered a meritorious point of view
 that is worth reading and considering.

My own expertise and interest is in primary content -- in particular,
 facilitating and hastening its open accessibility through institutional
 self-archiving. A new generation of secondary services will no doubt be
 built upon this open-access, full-text, OAI-tagged distributed database,
 harvested from research institutions the world over. There is already a
 growing list of OAI service providers:
 http://www.openarchives.org/service/listproviders.html

So far, these are all free services, but there is nothing to prevent
 fee-based services from trying to find niches here, if they have a service
 that users find worth paying for (and that the free services cannot match or
 better). Among the large existing free and fee-based providers, Elsevier's
 Scirus
http://www.scirus.com/html/scirus_service_provider.htm
has already made a notable entry here, but with a free service, provided as a
value-added for their fee-based products, including the toll-access
 full-texts that are not available yet in open-access.

You ask me for my view on existing secondary services such as BIOSIS and
 ISI's Web-of-Science. They all provide valuable services, and obviously it
 is their value plus the user's ability to pay that decides which is best for
 whom today. In future, when all full-text journal articles are online and
 open-access, these services will no doubt have to upgrade and restructure
 themselves. Google already provides full- text inversion for all publicly
 available web documents. In my view, boolean search on inverted full-text
 plus the google ranking algorithm (based on link counts and authorities)
 will be hard to beat, but no doubt ever more powerful new tools will emerge.
 The open-access full-text corpus will also be fully citation-interlinked, so
 ISI too will have to work hard to stay ahead of the game.

>Stevan Harnad

The eventual outcome among secondaries is anyone's guess. The priority now is
hastening open access for the primary corpus.

-------------------------------------------------------

-- 

Best wishes

Peter Strickland
Managing Editor
IUCr Journals

----------------------------------------------------------------------
IUCr Editorial Office, 5 Abbey Square, Chester CH1 2HU, England
Phone: 44 1244 342878   Fax: 44 1244 314888   Email: [email protected]
Ftp: ftp.iucr.org   WWW: http://journals.iucr.org/

NEWSFLASH: Complete text of all IUCr journals back to 1948 
now online! Visit Crystallography Journals Online for more details

Reply to: [list | sender only]

• Prev by Date: Re: EPC: putting out-of-print Xtal textbooks on-line?
• Next by Date: Report on Developing Country Access Survey
• Prev by thread: Report on Developing Country Access Survey
• Next by thread: EPC: putting out-of-print Xtal textbooks on-line?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread