[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
[Imgcif-l] Questions of reference frames
- To: <imgcif-l@iucr.org>
- Subject: [Imgcif-l] Questions of reference frames
- From: <Graeme.Winter@Diamond.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:41:41 -0000
Hi Folks, I'm still trying to finish off the details of our CBF template here and I have hit what feels like a slight conceptual snag... The X axis is defined as rigidly the direction of the rotation axis, from the sample. Now, historically the sample has been "small" so this is pretty clear, but if the sample is "large" (or a normal size, but on a uFocus beamline) then we can consider different regions of the sample for exposure. A very real possibility is then to offset the rotation axis from the direct beam, so that a toroidal region of sample is exposed. This then brings a conceptual challenge: The origin of the coordinate system is defined as the point where the rotation axis intersects the direct beam. They do not intersect. Hmmm... Also, if I do wish to translate the rotation axis, how to I report this? The reference frame is "fixed" to this, so in effect I am moving the beamline (indeed, the whole world) by the same distance in the opposite direction. It would be good to record this, so that an analysis program can determine the use of a toroidal (or corkscrew) data collection for radiation damage purposes, given the size and placement of the direct beam. Has anyone else figured this out? Of have I the wrong end of the stick (quite likely!) Many thanks, Graeme Graeme Winter Software and MX Support Scientist Diamond Light Source +44 1235 778091 (work) +44 7786 662784 (work mobile) -- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail. Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message. Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom _______________________________________________ imgcif-l mailing list imgcif-l@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/imgcif-l
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Imgcif-l] Questions of reference frames (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Prev by Date: Re: [Imgcif-l] Debugging CBFlib fatal error 4 Invalid functionargument
- Next by Date: [Imgcif-l] ... also
- Prev by thread: Re: [Imgcif-l] ... also
- Next by thread: Re: [Imgcif-l] Questions of reference frames
- Index(es):