[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [Imgcif-l] CBFlib_0.7.7 update to subrelease 0.7.7.4
- To: The Crystallographic Binary File and its imgCIF application to image data <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [Imgcif-l] CBFlib_0.7.7 update to subrelease 0.7.7.4
- From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <[email protected]>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 06:04:29 -0400 (EDT)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- References: <a06230900c263c9ef345a@[192.168.2.100]> <[email protected]><a06230901c2650c68c4a0@[192.168.10.211]><a06230901c2661cb7928d@[192.168.2.100]><[email protected]> <a06230900c26f662cc786@[192.168.2.100]><[email protected]>
Jon,
Thank you.
Herbert
=====================================================
Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769
+1-631-244-3035
[email protected]
=====================================================
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Jon Wright wrote:
> Dear Herbert,
>
> Just tried it and it seems to work on this system too.
>
> Best,
>
> Jon
>
>
>
> Herbert J. Bernstein wrote:
> > Dear Jon,
> >
> > I think I found the g95 problem. Please try changing line 8 of
> > test_fcb_read_image.m4 to read
> >
> > INTEGER,PARAMETER:: FCB_BYTES_IN_REC=4096
> >
> > instead of
> >
> > INTEGER,PARAMETER:: FCB_BYTES_IN_REC=131072
> >
> > This will make the blocks for reads commensurate with the padding
> > in the data files. It appears that g95 differs from the other
> > f90 systems we have tried in its handling of a short record.
> > I will investigate further, but this changes seems to allow all tests
> > to run successfully, at least on my system.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Herbert
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> imgcif-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/imgcif-l
>
_______________________________________________
imgcif-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/imgcif-l
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- [Imgcif-l] CBFlib_0.7.7 update to subrelease 0.7.7.4 (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [Imgcif-l] CBFlib_0.7.7 update to subrelease 0.7.7.4 (Jon Wright)
- Re: [Imgcif-l] CBFlib_0.7.7 update to subrelease 0.7.7.4 (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [Imgcif-l] CBFlib_0.7.7 update to subrelease 0.7.7.4 (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [Imgcif-l] CBFlib_0.7.7 update to subrelease 0.7.7.4 (Jon Wright)
- Re: [Imgcif-l] CBFlib_0.7.7 update to subrelease 0.7.7.4 (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [Imgcif-l] CBFlib_0.7.7 update to subrelease 0.7.7.4 (Jon Wright)
- Prev by Date: Re: [Imgcif-l] CBFlib_0.7.7 update to subrelease 0.7.7.4
- Next by Date: [Imgcif-l] Draft workshop report
- Prev by thread: Re: [Imgcif-l] CBFlib_0.7.7 update to subrelease 0.7.7.4
- Next by thread: [Imgcif-l] imgCIF Standard Axis definition
- Index(es):

