[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: polarization
- To: imgcif-l@bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: polarization
- From: Harry Powell <harry@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 10:53:10 +0100 (BST)
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10009111038050.18775-100000@epsilon.pair.com>
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Herbert J. Bernstein wrote: > tag. Perhaps we also need to consider measures of polarization other than > a ratio. I couldn't agree more, except to say that it does depend on what the ratio is you're using. As I understand it, the core CIF ratio is the ratio of the perpendicularly polarized to the parallel polarized component, which means there's a range of from 0 - infinity, which strikes me as daft. The value used for the polarization in common software (and also the figure used in Giacovazzo's book from a few years back) is the ratio (Ih-Iv)/(Ih+Iv) {Ih = intensity of the electric vector in the horizontal plane, Iv ditto in vertical plane}, which could conceivably vary from -1 to +1. Of course, the "horizontal" and "vertical" planes have to be defined, (IMHO) with respect to a laboratory set of axes. > On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Jim Pflugrath wrote: > I use the polarization that Wolfgang Kabsch defined in his 1988 paper. > It consists of the degree of polarization and a vector which defines > a normal to the plane of polarization. So core CIF almost has it with > this vector implicit. The vector is defined is terms of the lab > coordinate system (remember the MSC system?). > > Jim > I notice on reading through the HARVESTing code supplied by Kim Henrick of the EBI that the following items exist and appear to be suitable for our use here; _diffrn_radiation.polarisn_ratio - this uses the polarization value supplied to MOSFLM or Denzo _diffrn_radiation.polarisation_collimation - this takes an argument (modifier?), examples of which are; pinhole or mirrors with unpolarised beam graphite monochromator synchrotron BTW, my _English_ Oxford English Dictionary spells "polariz-{e,ation}" with a "z", which also seems to be the American convention ;-) Harry -- Dr Harry Powell, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, MRC Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QH
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: polarization (I. David Brown)
- References:
- Re: polarization (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Prev by Date: Re: polarization
- Next by Date: Re: polarization
- Prev by thread: Re: polarization
- Next by thread: Re: polarization
- Index(es):