[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: imgCIF / CBF web pages
- To: imgcif-l@bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: imgCIF / CBF web pages
- From: yaya@bernstein-plus-sons.com (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 10:53:52 -0500
I would hope and expect that by the time a DDL2-based imageCIF dictionary coordinated with the mmCIF dictionary were completed, that all the tools and techniques needed to _automatically_ integrate DDL1-based and DDL2-based dictionaries would be in place. There is actually very little conflict between dictionaries in the two styles (e.g. CIFtbx2 already has hooks to handle mixed collections of such dictionaries internally). The issues of integration between the powder dictionary and imageCIF are very similar to the issues of integration between the powder dictionary and mmCIF, so I would suggest that this common problem be handled by common approaches, rather than the imageCIF effort concerning itself separately with the DDL1 vs DDL2 issues. For the moment, a purely DDL2-based effort well-integrated with mmCIF would seem a very coherent, constructive and productive approach. -- Herbert > Is CBF an extension of CIF or mmCIF? > > I have not checked what Andy has put on his web page, but, in >response to John Westbrook's message, it is important to point out that >CBF is, an fact, a CIF dictionary developed using DDL2 and not just an >extension of mmCIF. It is a separate dictionary to be used in conjunction >with any other CIF dictionary. The reason that the Brookhaven workshop >agreed to develop CBF using DDL2 rather than DDL1 was that the DDL2 to >DDL1 conversion was easier than the other way around. Comcifs expects the >CBF working group to prepare a DDL1 as well as a DDL2 version so that CBF >can be used in conjunction with any CIF dictionary. CBF must be >applicable in any situation where area detectors are used, not just in >those situations involving macromolecules. > > It is true that since it was decided that the initial development >would be under DDL2, CBF will be developed in close collaboration with >mmCIF, but CBF must not be seen as just an extension of mmCIF. It is a >separate CIF dictionary of equal standing with the coreCIF, mmCIF and >pdCIF dictionaries. Each of these is maintained separately, but >together they constitute a coordinated suite of dictionaries. > > David Brown > > Chair of Comicfs > > >***************************************************** >Dr.I.David Brown >Brockhouse Institute for Materials Research, >McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada >Tel: 1-(905)-525-9140 ext 24710 >Fax: 1-(905)-521-2773 >***************************************************** ===================================================== **** BERNSTEIN + SONS * * INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONSULTANTS **** P.O. BOX 177, BELLPORT, NY 11713-0177 * * *** **** * Herbert J. Bernstein * *** yaya@bernstein-plus-sons.com *** * * *** 1-516-286-1339 FAX: 1-516-286-1999 =====================================================
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: Re: imgCIF / CBF web pages
- Next by Date: Re: imgCIF / CBF web pages
- Prev by thread: Re: imgCIF / CBF web pages
- Next by thread: Re: imgCIF / CBF web pages
- Index(es):