Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2

Dear Ulrich

This is a quick response to your welcome additions
to the recommendations.... as I am not back in the
lab until Tuesday.

Part 3 in the draft circulated had only (a) for the
reasons I explained.... I certainly tried to identify
more from the communications. Your suggestions are
sufficiently broad to be meaningful to most of the
IUCr, and I would support their inclusion.

I encourage other members to put forward suggested
additions to all parts, and 3. in particular.

Regards
Syd

PS: Howard, thank you for your endorsement of the
circulated recommendations.... and there's still
time for some macromolecular recommendations if they
come to mind!

------
Professor Sydney R. Hall
School Biomedical & Chemical Sciences
University of Western Australia
Crawley, 6009  AUSTRALIA.
Ph: +61 (8) 6488 2725
Fx: +61 (8) 6488 1118
"Data data everywhere but not a thought to think!" - Theodore Roszak


On 14/07/2005, at 4:25 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> thank you for the draft of recommendations. I am not sure whether I
> received the complete draft, because under part 3 I only received item
> (a) and further items might have been lost in the file I received.
>
> If there really was only the one item (a), then I would like to have
> added at least the following items:
> (b) The user of the browser should be able to select the kind of
> information he or she needs, e.g. figure of symmetry elements,
> reflection conditions, subgroups etc.
> (c) There should be links between the different kinds of information,
> e.g., it should be possible to jump from the subgroups to the
> Wyckoff-position relations, or from a listed subgroup to the main page
> of this subgroup.
>
> Kind regards,
> Ulrich Mueller
>
>
> Sydney Hall schrieb:
>>
>> Dear ITOWG colleagues
>>
>> Attached is a draft of the recommendations we
>> will be put forward to the EC in Florence.
>> Notwithstanding that there may be an opportunity
>> to discuss these directly with the EC, and to
>> make further suggestions after the IT Open meeting,
>> I believe our recommendations should be as complete
>> as we can make them at this stage. .......
>>
>> You will note that part 3 of the recommendations is
>> definitely light on. There was considerable discussion
>> about presenting symmetry information .........
>>
>> I look forward to your feedback.
>>
>> Best wishes
>> Syd
>