Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pdDMG] Duplication of _pd_refln.wavelength_id and_refln.wavelength_id

Hi, James:
I have no problem with deleting the former one, as it is less-general.
Jim Kaduk
On 2021-11-28 20:08, James H via pdDMG wrote:> Dear Powder DMG,> > It has been noted [1] that _pd_refln.wavelength_id and> _refln.wavelength_id describe the same thing. I assume that the latter> was defined before the former. Are there any objections to formally> deprecating the former? Deprecation involves stating that it is> deprecated in the textual definition, and setting a machine-readable> DDLm attribute accordingly. The data name can never be completely> removed, of course.> > thanks,> James.> [1] https://github.com/COMCIFS/Powder_Dictionary/issues/4> > --> T +61 (02) 9717 9907> F +61 (02) 9717 3145> M +61 (04) 0249 4148> _______________________________________________> pdDMG mailing list> pdDMG@iucr.org> http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pddmg_______________________________________________pdDMG mailing listpdDMG@iucr.orghttp://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pddmg

[Send comment to list owner]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]