[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SA_scat] Windows for SAXS cryostat

• To: sa_scat@iucr.org
• Subject: Re: [SA_scat] Windows for SAXS cryostat
• From: Richard Gillilan <reg8@cornell.edu>
• Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 09:30:23 -0400
• In-Reply-To: <59A555F0-B164-11D8-BF63-000A958A7B5C@mac.com>

I have used natural mica sheets in the past, but
recently tried a synthetic material called 3525 Ultralene.
I didn't notice any unusual scattering background (the
polymer film was only 4 um thick), though I have not tested
it extensively yet.

You can get it from

     SpexCertiPrep
     203 Norcross Ave
     Metuchen, NJ 08840
     phone: 1-800-LAB-SPEX

I believe Lois Pollack's group here at Cornell is
also experimenting with even thinner windows via
nanofabrication methods, but they are quite fragile.
She may describe them is some of her recent papers.

Richard Gillilan
MacCHESS, Cornell University

_______________________________________________
sa_scat mailing list
sa_scat@iucr.org
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/sa_scat

Reply to: [list | sender only]

• References:
  • [SA_scat] Windows for SAXS cryostat (JDB Science LLC )

• Prev by Date: Re: [SA_scat] Windows for SAXS cryostat
• Next by Date: [SA_scat] Wim Bras's reply
• Prev by thread: Re: [SA_scat] Windows for SAXS cryostat
• Next by thread: RE: [SA_scat] Windows for SAXS cryostat
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread