[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: CIF 2.0 and Jmol
- Subject: Re: CIF 2.0 and Jmol
- From: James Hester <jamesrhester@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:04:58 +1100
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;bh=w/vGRY59d91k+qFkkhbb7Y+0zSYx8TQ14ZMJePe5HcI=;b=jkBHukKaDBMkIbUPjmAfBzLOJfcWZYs+R7omGb31gOATz8KpKVZB9aJqTWCnrC1NiAcJmgfWX466r7OHFFuMcdtjhuDeLp5SrGxt8AOiPaKTob6GntMP628fmXf+uX8Rz+oCkAulNAmfOfxKWi07QB7+RLE97EgmazFzHRJBbYCUQa8y6mmxjL0TjXFk290x11VCDf8kAcAnNoUyZfIAcZjbvnaMbXwn6GQkkZumbRv3DJnPWJWZy90Vjdag52KQC0UhSukX9x0+w0Ned3BM8UvDbfBTESwKn5sYd6KyhuJLU62fDuyWaGbvzcP5dFv2jWq77ZlwuGDsXcchyOAJtA==
- In-Reply-To: <CAF_YUvXz_t+2Os38TQSDbEtHJFk3rBLs1PyhecSmmamO6O0tFQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAF_YUvXz_t+2Os38TQSDbEtHJFk3rBLs1PyhecSmmamO6O0tFQ@mail.gmail.com>
That's great news. Is there any interest among CIF developers here in having a standard JSON representation of a CIF file? If so, perhaps the Jmol approach would be suitable for standardisation?
_______________________________________________ cif-developers mailing list cif-developers@iucr.org http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- CIF 2.0 and Jmol (Robert Hanson)
- Prev by Date: CIF 2.0 and Jmol
- Next by Date: JSON representation
- Prev by thread: CIF 2.0 and Jmol
- Next by thread: first post - question about file format
- Index(es):