[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
DDLm dictionaries: treatment of alias data names
- Subject: DDLm dictionaries: treatment of alias data names
- From: Antanas Vaitkus <antanas.vaitkus90@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:23:58 +0300
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;bh=+bATSAxcYtSPMCwA65YzOCsVYbpnd7EdyG1iCORZ2ys=;b=fBj7Uw4eps4t5AuK77oS6EAmgKHJ2dIHu0g67Ixw/PAcqfQVxVN48TuIKpjVAJH6cgKSBFdSiOadY38uagmUqzSBxQ9aAWLcYocl0RRjym7T4SN8TZOqxlsMjkYxObAFR8/PDh+Idf/DD0Kh9Xg83/0jq00SsZd67cYHIq5867adHrBEoBPwmJOyPrvgNmit47Ixe9LJ5d1q1GwlIZ1HnP3Ecp0SZKEsqqhJl4GkEWwWR6SNlzvCwkokBgi5H6/5Vx6IXl2RrfBL4GauP+eW0/3VwKwZHVSnlXa8AMR1kR/SLSDY8+X+o7qvu80mWZxTGM6sUlQAUODiquFXfqbhRA==
DDLm based dictionaries allow specifying alias data names for data items (i. e. _diffrn.special_details has two aliases -- _diffrn_special_details and _diffrn.details). I was wondering if there are any official IUCr guidelines how the CIF file should be interpreted if several of these values are present in the same data block. Does it become an invalid file (following the logic that a data name can only appear once in a file)?
--
room V325, Saulėtekio al. 7,
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
Antanas Vaitkus,
PhD student at Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology,room V325, Saulėtekio al. 7,
LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
_______________________________________________ cif-developers mailing list cif-developers@iucr.org http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DDLm dictionaries: treatment of alias data names (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Prev by Date: Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-22
- Next by Date: RE: COMCIFS open meeting 1.15pm Fri 25th Aug MR 2.06
- Prev by thread: Re: COMCIFS open meeting 1.15pm Fri 25th Aug MR 2.06
- Next by thread: Re: DDLm dictionaries: treatment of alias data names
- Index(es):