Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Request for comment on review of CIF-aware crystallographicpackages

Dear Ton
Thank you very much; that additional level of information is extremelyhelpful. It also, happily, allows me to insert a reference to WinGX,which, though widely used, so far as I can tell has no features thattake particular advantage of CIF.
Best wishesBrian

On 11/06/2025 18:33, Spek, A.L. (Ton) via cif-developers wrote:> Dear Brian,> >  > > PLATON/checkCIF also recognises the following datanames for embedding> refinement info in the CIF.> >  > > _/iucr/_refine _/fcf/_details> > _/shelx_fcf/_file> > _/iucr_refine_instructions/_details> > _/iucr_refine_instructions_details/_restraints> > _/iucr_refine_instructions_details/_constraints> >  > > The first two are/can be used for the embedding of the FCF file (either> non-SHELXL or SHELXL based resp.)> > This is used by OLEX2 and WINGX users to avoid explicit submission of> FCF data.> >  > > Best wishes> >  > > Ton_______________________________________________cif-developers mailing [email protected]https://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers

Reply to: [list | sender only]