[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Sense of calculating differences between target and refined values
- Subject: Sense of calculating differences between target and refined values
- From: Brian McMahon via cif-developers <cif-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 10:38:47 +0100
- Cc: Brian McMahon <bm@xxxxxxxx>
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iucr.org; s=mailman;t=1780911528; bh=HusU5H1RueqQQHYmXnfwh4VNWVOKY/Udq30jgK4cZB0=;h=Date:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:From;b=WY6/LgqAb2gVhW9NCcqLh0F0/HJ+16NUrJ0RpjMRki99Aa5FXZgBwxEn9gFcyGomw gvyXQ7MhbXcglj6NgY5F3MJyd6pPY/exqPZO38/J6wmsboW/jIxoz5S0DClaWCnM4h TJ4OeFBxLn82xINVaCSzdEAZDA3Qw+OyuRKqWsoUgIqmohUYiqaYY3wYcU+OdCidW4 VBoal8i+xTUP48Z4e4kYYaXfB2WTaMmqHPcj+eummTiONtQrrOnc1UQC4085b5bAI2 kzAI8Gi/iZ/4RdbM3kls+bTAcUSHEu9hgEdpcEUl55sSlf+yLmrVnkSZzKGkuJ8Qas OeNMMX/yaBXpw==
In reviewing the CIF restraints dictionary for publication in Volume G(https://www.iucr.org/resources/cif/dictionaries/cif_core_restraints,https://github.com/COMCIFS/cif_restr) it has been noticed that there area number of defined quantities such as data_restr_distance_diff _name '_restr_distance_diff' _category restr_distance _units A _units_detail Angstrom _definition; The difference between the target and the refined distance.; There is a possible ambiguity in the use of "between": is (target -refined) to be calculated, or (refined - target)? I propose to resolvethis ambiguity by adding to the definitions an explicit(refined - target) as suggested by Lukas Palatinus in analogy to thenormal "obs - calc" convention in reporting differences in Fobs-Fcalcmaps or listings, and as carried out by JANA2020. Does anyone have any objection, or write code that performs thecalculations in the opposite sense? ThanksBrian_______________________________________________cif-developers mailing [email protected]https://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: Re: Request for comment on review of CIF-aware crystallographicpackages
- Next by thread: Request for comment on review of CIF-aware crystallographic packages
- Index(es):

