[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] CIF header
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] CIF header
- From: Nick Spadaccini <nick@csse.uwa.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:30:44 +0800
- Authentication-Results: postfix;
- In-Reply-To: <4AEB0A7E.5080007@niehs.nih.gov>
On 30/10/09 11:47 PM, "Joe Krahn" <krahn@niehs.nih.gov> wrote: > A directive embedded in an initial comment really does make sense, > because it is irrelevant once the correct parser is selected. It might > make sense to add a specific 2nd character, similar to the POSIX shell > #!. For example, the STAR format could define an initial line beginning > with #% as parsing directive rather than just a plain comment. That > makes the abuse of a comment line as a bit less of a hack. Is there a reason why it can't be #!, to make it consistent with other *nix based directives. cheers Nick -------------------------------- Associate Professor N. Spadaccini, PhD School of Computer Science & Software Engineering The University of Western Australia t: +61 (0)8 6488 3452 35 Stirling Highway f: +61 (0)8 6488 1089 CRAWLEY, Perth, WA 6009 AUSTRALIA w3: www.csse.uwa.edu.au/~nick MBDP M002 CRICOS Provider Code: 00126G e: Nick.Spadaccini@uwa.edu.au _______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ddlm-group] CIF header (James Hester)
- References:
- Re: [ddlm-group] CIF header (Joe Krahn)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] CIF-2 changes
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Relationship of CIF2 to legacy platforms
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] CIF header
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] CIF header
- Index(es):