[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
- From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <[email protected]>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:55:39 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- References: <C7398588.126B6%[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]>
If the will of the body is that we are not going to have CIF 1.5, then, reluctantly, I vote 'for' allowing quote characters in non-delimited strings provided they are not the first character -- Herbert ===================================================== Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121 Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769 +1-631-244-3035 [email protected] ===================================================== On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, SIMON WESTRIP wrote: > I vote 'for' > > Simon > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > From: James Hester <[email protected]> > To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, 1 December, 2009 5:56:52 > Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF > > *NOTE REQUEST FOR VOTE BELOW* > > Simon: From reading your previous emails, I'm guessing that the source of > your concern is that the possible characterset of non-delimited strings > appears more restrictive than is strictly necessary. In particular, you're > not sure why we have excluded quote and double quote from non-delimited > strings. > > You are correct that the other CIF2 syntax does not require that quote or > double quote are excluded from non-delimited strings (apart from the first > character, of course). The exclusion of the quote/double quote was on > general principle of keeping all characters that serve as delimiters out of > non-delimited strings, even if those characters could never cause confusion. > It also has the benefit of allowing some syntax errors to be picked up. > > Nick is with me in Sydney, and we have decided that this is the sort of > issue that we just have to vote on, as the arguments either way are not > conclusive. > > I would therefore call everybody to vote on the following proposition: > > "That <quote> and <double quote> may appear in non-delimited strings, as > long as they are not the first character" > > Voting so far: > > Against: Nick > For: James > Agnostic: ? > > -- > T +61 (02) 9717 9907 > F +61 (02) 9717 3145 > M +61 (04) 0249 4148 > >
_______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list [email protected] http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF (John Westbrook)
- References:
- Re: [ddlm-group] Space as a list item separator (Nick Spadaccini)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Space as a list item separator (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Space as a list item separator (SIMON WESTRIP)
- [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Space as a list item separator>
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
- Index(es):