[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
- From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <[email protected]>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:55:39 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- References: <C7398588.126B6%[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]>
If the will of the body is that we are not going to have CIF 1.5, then,
reluctantly, I vote 'for' allowing quote characters in non-delimited
strings provided they are not the first character -- Herbert
=====================================================
Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769
+1-631-244-3035
[email protected]
=====================================================
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, SIMON WESTRIP wrote:
> I vote 'for'
>
> Simon
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> From: James Hester <[email protected]>
> To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, 1 December, 2009 5:56:52
> Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
>
> *NOTE REQUEST FOR VOTE BELOW*
>
> Simon: From reading your previous emails, I'm guessing that the source of
> your concern is that the possible characterset of non-delimited strings
> appears more restrictive than is strictly necessary. In particular, you're
> not sure why we have excluded quote and double quote from non-delimited
> strings.
>
> You are correct that the other CIF2 syntax does not require that quote or
> double quote are excluded from non-delimited strings (apart from the first
> character, of course). The exclusion of the quote/double quote was on
> general principle of keeping all characters that serve as delimiters out of
> non-delimited strings, even if those characters could never cause confusion.
> It also has the benefit of allowing some syntax errors to be picked up.
>
> Nick is with me in Sydney, and we have decided that this is the sort of
> issue that we just have to vote on, as the arguments either way are not
> conclusive.
>
> I would therefore call everybody to vote on the following proposition:
>
> "That <quote> and <double quote> may appear in non-delimited strings, as
> long as they are not the first character"
>
> Voting so far:
>
> Against: Nick
> For: James
> Agnostic: ?
>
> --
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>
>
_______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list [email protected] http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF (John Westbrook)
- References:
- Re: [ddlm-group] Space as a list item separator (Nick Spadaccini)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Space as a list item separator (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Space as a list item separator (SIMON WESTRIP)
- [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Space as a list item separator>
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Role of separators in CIF
- Index(es):

