[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ddlm-group] Removing Octal,Hexadecimal and Binary as DDLm types

On 2018-02-19 13:13, Simon Westrip wrote:> Hi James - I'd be inclined just to drop the types in DDLm.> Extending the semantics used for presenting numbers> seems like placing an unnecessary burden on CIF application developers> (obliged to look out for octal, hexadecimal, binary ...)
May I chime in as an implementer:
actually, burden is not so large; if standard (libc-compatible)representations are used, all these cases are handled by standardlibraries, no extra coding is necessary.
-- Dr. Saulius Gra┼żulisVilnius University Institute of Biotechnology, Saul─Śtekio al. 7LT-10257 Vilnius, Lietuva (Lithuania)fax: (+370-5)-2234367 / phone (office): (+370-5)-2234353mobile: (+370-684)-49802, (+370-614)-36366_______________________________________________ddlm-group mailing listddlm-group@iucr.orghttp://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group

Reply to: [list | sender only]