[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Recommendations by the ITO working group
- To: Brian McMahon <[email protected]>, Mois Aroyo <[email protected]>,Ulrich Mueller <[email protected]>,Michael Glazer <[email protected]>,Howard Flack <[email protected]>,Howard Einspahr <[email protected]>,John R.Helliwell <[email protected]>,Nicola Ashcroft <[email protected]>
- Subject: Recommendations by the ITO working group
- From: Sydney Hall <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 10:27:05 +0800
- Cc: Peter Strickland <[email protected]>,Helen Berman <[email protected]>
Dear ITO WG colleagues, Nicola and I have been discussing what form the recommendations from the working group should take in order to be of most use in the planning and development of IT Online. As you know, the Chester office is already well advanced in preparing some ITO material for a demonstration at the Congress, and for a preliminary ITO launch in January by agreement with Springer. From what I can judge, many of the general recommendations for online presentation arising from our communications are addressed by what they are currently doing. Of course, this does not preclude us from making such recommendations anyway in order to emphasize their importance but, as Nicola's latest mail attached below suggests, what would be really helpful is advice on specific extra data and functionality needed in future versions. It was intended to let us see the Florence ITO presentation in April/ May (see attachment D of the communication summary attached) but it is not ready yet, so we will have to base any specific recommendations (in advance of Florence) on the information that Nicola has supplied below. Clearly this is not easy to do without the details of what is already their... but it is worth a try. Please send me any suggestions you have on specific data, functionality and approaches that don't appear to be considered so far. In the meantime I will prepare some draft recommendations based on our communications thus far. I have also suggested that convening the working party at the congress after the ITO presentation might be useful so that we can give our final suggestions. Nicola will discuss this with Hartmut Fuess. Best wishes Syd ------ Professor Sydney R. Hall School Biomedical & Chemical Sciences University of Western Australia Crawley, 6009 AUSTRALIA. Ph: +61 (8) 6488 2725 Fx: +61 (8) 6488 1118 "Data data everywhere but not a thought to think!" - Theodore Roszak
From: [email protected] Subject: Re: more on ITOWG recommendations Date: 1 July 2005 11:22:57 PM To: [email protected] Reply-To: [email protected] Dear Syd, We are currently working against the clock, and probably will only be able to show a working model of Volume D by the Congress. However, what we are � planning to make available in the 'basic representation' in 2006 is as follows: HTML and PDFs for all the material in the series: the reader will be able to choose to view a whole chapter at a time or just individual sections, tables or figures if they wish. In addition, in volumes with space-group tables, each space group will have an HTML and PDF representation. HTML navigation: ability to move quickly around a chapter and its sections, around a volume and between volumes. Hyperlinks between volumes and out from reference lists. Indexes that link back to the relevant text. Full-text searching facilities. Linked contents listings at the volume, part and chapter levels. Tables will be HTML and PDF. Figures will be thumbnails and full-sized gifs. Maths will initially be gifs. As far as additions to this go, we will probably make available the programs and supplementary material from the CD-ROMs that accompany Volumes D and G, but would like advice on other things to add. Any programs that manipulate IT data could be considered for inclusion as 'added features' as long as the working group think they are worth adding. We're hoping that the working group (a) know of more possibilities than we do and (b) can advise us on which are worth the effort of adding. Similarly, we know we can convert tables of data into databases that the reader can then use to plot or otherwise manipulate the data, but this takes quite a bit of work per table, so we would need advice on which tables it would be worth doing this to. Hope this is some help. Best wishes, Nicola
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recommendations by the ITO working group (Howard Flack)
- Prev by Date: Re: Summary of IT Online WG discussions thus far
- Next by Date: Re: Recommendations by the ITO working group
- Prev by thread: Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2
- Next by thread: Re: Recommendations by the ITO working group
- Index(es):

