[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2

• To: Sydney Hall <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2
• From: Howard Flack <[email protected]>
• Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:09:02 +0200
• Cc: [email protected], Ulrich Mueller <[email protected]>,Mois Aroyo <[email protected]>,"John R.Helliwell" <[email protected]>,Helen Berman <[email protected]>,Nicola Ashcroft <[email protected]>,Michael Glazer <[email protected]>,Howard Einspahr <[email protected]>, Brian McMahon <[email protected]>
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]><[email protected]>

> though 1(c)
> may be seen as a bit too prescriptive.


   Instead how about:

The maintenance of print-on-paper volumes of IT is a matter of market
demand. A switch from bulk lithograph printing to digital printing to
print-on-demand will enable smaller numbers of volumes to be printed and
warehoused, but with an increased unit production cost and selling
price. Timely decisions will need to made on this matter.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2 (john richard helliwell)

• References:
  • DRAFT recommendations v1.2 (Sydney Hall)
  • Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2 (Sydney Hall)
  • Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2 (Howard Flack)
  • Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2 (Sydney Hall)

• Prev by Date: Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2
• Next by Date: Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2
• Prev by thread: Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2
• Next by thread: Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread