[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: CIF-JSON new draft
- Subject: Re: CIF-JSON new draft
- From: Marcin Wojdyr <wojdyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 18:52:51 +0100
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;bh=iFLRFIerTleuzolM/KkXGDIngSR7Qa1fesekCIYHe7o=;b=GQ8emwC8yOv/K2yv8SVlMnh0lTgaWw00Z3gHGSmtyesw7YDKp+znjlHyxc43YspyAyX0bulUNjFR+fhr2d5XuBB6xTLdsW0qVdJpsqTZ92vu27Yo0DMLzqnVr143+jKEGvCBvinND4VHaO5OAPuz+OefxvcFtvcsj/aU1BOpTlyfkX0MPfnvKQOfgDGmsbKTwhW6j39QIfqmql6cYJEkWSBRsmiy8mRbBwnfJcRpl0L9fo9mAiPjWeh6YBTw3Pmobue7Vh8Kvub93yjjeTZ8JJc7YiR8mn+PyJDlbWESbCGkehomitcuceME7Dfj8xsXtKTtUuzHMW2tqS+GC6IhKQ==
- In-Reply-To: <CAM+dB2cLpbNHsahgS03o+GC6N1SxPkRpMeJctELLgM8pF0f_Mw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAM+dB2ey9kKLoZY=WE7Uy-fiWTGhQaFx7fcgODcYfhrNPwXkQw@mail.gmail.com><MWHPR04MB05123A9F46812A3372A252FCE0160@MWHPR04MB0512.namprd04.prod.outlook.com><MWHPR04MB051249D1082721C51E84232FE0160@MWHPR04MB0512.namprd04.prod.outlook.com><CAF_YUvVjKTmCC18=pNGgANU25phE8Gij9=boT=nw8vUZQKPHmw@mail.gmail.com><CACaHzQVW=koD_QV+70veqQL0PFQxLkB_Xhgs61xGK6_FTr91Fw@mail.gmail.com><CAF_YUvXkWoPFpgHe7u4Pr+h7SLtpypmAU0aSBfFD294fQdUvZA@mail.gmail.com><MWHPR04MB0512919511496E7B5E5C526DE0EA0@MWHPR04MB0512.namprd04.prod.outlook.com><CAM+dB2cLpbNHsahgS03o+GC6N1SxPkRpMeJctELLgM8pF0f_Mw@mail.gmail.com>
On 5 May 2017 at 07:45, James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com> wrote:> Would it work better if we made "?" JSON null? +1 > I support John's suggestion to put all datanames in lists, as it nicely unifies datavalue representation -1, I'd rather have a single CIF value represented as a JSON value, not a list._______________________________________________cif-developers mailing listcif-developers@iucr.orghttp://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- CIF-JSON new draft (James Hester)
- RE: CIF-JSON new draft (Bollinger, John C)
- RE: CIF-JSON new draft (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: CIF-JSON new draft (Robert Hanson)
- Re: CIF-JSON new draft (Marcin Wojdyr)
- Re: CIF-JSON new draft (Robert Hanson)
- RE: CIF-JSON new draft (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: CIF-JSON new draft (James Hester)
- Prev by Date: Re: CIF-JSON new draft
- Next by Date: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-08
- Prev by thread: Re: CIF-JSON new draft
- Next by thread: RE: CIF-JSON new draft
- Index(es):