[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .
- From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <[email protected]>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 06:56:09 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><8F77913624F7524AACD2A92EAF3BFA54166D7D1EF6@SJMEMXMBS11.stjude.sjcrh.local><[email protected]><8F77913624F7524AACD2A92EAF3BFA54166D7D1EFC@SJMEMXMBS11.stjude.sjcrh.local><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]>
Aye. -- Herbert
=====================================================
Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769
+1-631-244-3035
[email protected]
=====================================================
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, James Hester wrote:
> Dear DDLm group,
>
> As per David's request, will you please indicate whether or not you
> support the tag set proposal currently posted at
>
> http://arcib.dowling.edu/~bernsteh/BplusS_DDLm_changes_2Feb11.dic
>
> James.
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:36 AM, David Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Dear James,
>>
>> There seems to be general agreement on Herbert's version of the DDLm changes
>> to the alias and xref items given at the url in the email below, but we
>> should have a vote to formally adopt these changes in the draft DDLm that we
>> are evaluating.� Eventually the fully revised DDLm will have to be voted on
>> by COMCIFS, but at this stage we need to know that the DDLm discussion group
>> is on board so that we can start adapting DDLm CIF dictionaries.� In my
>> case, this will require changes to the majority of items in the dictionary
>> and I want to make sure that we all agree on how aliases should be presented
>> before I start making these changes.
>>
>> Can you please call for a vote.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>> Herbert J. Bernstein wrote:
>>
>> These messages are getting too long. I have posted the current
>> best draft of what I will be using for my own work at
>>
>> http://arcib.dowling.edu/~bernsteh/BplusS_DDLm_changes_2Feb11.dic
>>
>> which should be considered a preliminary proposal to COMCIFs
>> in support of the development of a DDLm dictionary for
>> imgCIF along with a DDLm dictionary for the portion of the
>> mmCIF dictionary needed to support imgCIF.
>>
>> I hope to have practical code using this to demonstrate in Madrid,
>> when we can discuss it face-to-face.
>> =====================================================
>> Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
>> Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
>> Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769
>>
>> +1-631-244-3035
>> [email protected]
>> =====================================================
>>
>> On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, Bollinger, John C wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 11:46 AM, Herbert J. Bernstein wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> I think the original COMCIFS decision of a global
>> name space was a wise choice for the major applications of
>> CIF, and would suggest we stick to it for DDLm.
>>
>> For the record, lest it be obscured by the volume of rhetoric, none of
>> the name space issues I have raised in this discussion of DDLm aliases
>> should be construed as advocacy for COMCIFS changing policy on naming,
>> prefixes, etc.. The introduction of DDLm is no justification for such a
>> disruptive move. All I ask the group to consider is whether DDLm should
>> provide for cases where COMCIFS policy is not observed.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> John
>>
>> --
>> John C. Bollinger, Ph.D.
>> Department of Structural Biology
>> St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
>>
>>
>> Email Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ddlm-group mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ddlm-group mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
>>
>> c
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ddlm-group mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
> _______________________________________________
> ddlm-group mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
>
_______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list [email protected] http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed) (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. . (John Westbrook)
- Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. .. .. . (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. .. .. .... . (John Westbrook)
- Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. .. .. .... .. . (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. .. .. .... .. . (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. . (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. . (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. . (David Brown)
- Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. . (James Hester)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .
- Index(es):

