[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] Fwd: Fwd: Searching for a compromise on eliding. .
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Fwd: Fwd: Searching for a compromise on eliding. .
- From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <[email protected]>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:58:19 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <8F77913624F7524AACD2A92EAF3BFA54168ECD35C3@SJMEMXMBS11.stjude.sjcrh.local>
- References: <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><8F77913624F7524AACD2A92EAF3BFA54168ECD35C3@SJMEMXMBS11.stjude.sjcrh.local>
Dear Colleagues,
While John B. is right about what you _can_ do in writing for
proposals F and GP, remember that F and GP include the \\ elide,
which would then allow sensible users to safely double _all_
backslashes that they want carried through unchanged. These
people will have a lot less trouble in managing their strings
than people who try to work on the sharp boundary of a
protocol that well may change as CIF2 and DDLm shake down in
real use. The ability to do this in CIF writers, making for very robust
data, is a strong reason to favor P, P-prime, F and GP, over
F' or G.
Regards,
Herbert
At 12:15 PM -0600 2/28/11, Bollinger, John C wrote:
>On Monday, February 28, 2011 10:31 AM, SIMON WESTRIP wrote:
>
>>As I understand F or F', doubling of backslashes would only really
>>be required
>>when a literal backslash is needed at the end of a line, because,
>>as in python,
>>all unrecognized escape sequences are returned 'as is', e.g.
>> ``\a\b\c\ \'\"`` will be returned as \a\b\c\ \'\" ?
>
>F' and G would require backslash doubling only when a literal
>backslash appears at the end of a line. If a line ends with
>multiple literal backslashes, then only the last one would or should
>be doubled.
>
>F and GP would require backslash doubling when a literal backslash
>appears at the end of a line, and also when a literal
>double-backslash appears anywhere (in which case both backslashes
>would need to be doubled, \\ -> \\\\). Other backslashes could be
>doubled for consistency, but that would be optional.
>
>These proposals all provide for syntax-level line folding and for
>including arbitrary text. So also do P, P', and Q.
>
>
>John
>
>>________________________________________
>>From: Brian McMahon <[email protected]>
>>To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]>
>>Sent: Monday, 28 February, 2011 15:11:59
>>Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Fwd: Fwd: Searching for a compromise on eliding
>>
>>I'm still working through my backlog of work and haven't time yet to
>>consider this in detail, but the converstaion has caught my attention:
>>this approach seems to offer us a solution with line-folding and the
>>ability to include arbitrary text. Is that right? If so, persistent
>>doubling of the backslash in cases such as TeX I would consider a
>>minor nuisance compared with the overall gain in functionality.
>>
>>Regards
>>Brian
>
>
>Email Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer
>_______________________________________________
>ddlm-group mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
--
=====================================================
Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769
+1-631-244-3035
[email protected]
=====================================================
_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
[email protected]
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- [ddlm-group] Searching for a compromise on eliding (James Hester)
- [ddlm-group] Fwd: Fwd: Searching for a compromise on eliding (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Fwd: Fwd: Searching for a compromise on eliding (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Fwd: Fwd: Searching for a compromise on eliding (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Fwd: Fwd: Searching for a compromise on eliding (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Fwd: Fwd: Searching for a compromise on eliding (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Fwd: Fwd: Searching for a compromise on eliding (Brian McMahon)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Fwd: Fwd: Searching for a compromise on eliding (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Fwd: Fwd: Searching for a compromise on eliding. . (Bollinger, John C)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Fwd: Fwd: Searching for a compromise on eliding.. . .
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Fwd: Fwd: Searching for a compromise on eliding.. . .
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Fwd: Fwd: Searching for a compromise on eliding. .. .
- Next by thread: [ddlm-group] Technical issues with Proposal P
- Index(es):

