Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CIF2 syntax document for COMCIFS approval

While I believe that this specification is incomplete and not yet ready
to provide a complete replacement for CIF1, I do believe it is a 
reasonable start on such a replacement.

I vote aye

and urge inclusion of tutorial sessions and/or a workshop on CIF2
for the IUCr meeting in Madrid.


  Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
    Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
         Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769


On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, James Hester wrote:

> After more than a year of discussion, the DDLm working group has
> converged on a specification for a new CIF syntax, dubbed "CIF2".  The
> one-page document describing the changes relative to CIF1 is available
> on the IUCr website at
> http://www.iucr.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/47434/cif2_syntax_changes_jrh20101115.pdf.
> A record of the extensive discussions of the DDLm working group is
> available at http://www.iucr.org/resources/lists/ddlm-group, with
> encoding-specific discussions taking place at
> http://www.iucr.org/resources/lists/cif2-encoding
> This CIF2 specification is now presented to COMCIFS for approval. I
> urge all COMCIFS voting members to register their vote in a timely
> fashion.
> James Hester
> -- 
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
> _______________________________________________
> comcifs mailing list
> comcifs@iucr.org
> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/comcifs

Reply to: [list | sender only]