Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Approval of remaining DDLm dictionaries

  • To: "Discussion list of the IUCr Committee for the Maintenance of the CIFStandard (COMCIFS)" <comcifs@iucr.org>
  • Subject: Approval of remaining DDLm dictionaries
  • From: James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:37:01 +1100
  • DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;bh=zwQFDrlRFBbSmejxR6RIQYf/EbhAAmjLzw5VCNrwy4E=;b=qlWBYvRTb944PKiCIm1hsvC+YY4R3yuq2rUMf+md1kWEIH6RSNEvaQNLN78JBSxwO9C/3AmPt7fZMlDsKre707Zcq3olx/TjQw7ZOdLmYn6HaBipZcymgH9DqYaTZvZEU5AysCtUKOI7z8h+Un/2+Ax1UrWMyfeWwgyZL0doIjD2Ng7jA1depMccq/5T284E5IyllPSLUgXPXOZK/O0+h7nQoDw9ru+FoMWENSByrCHjQHt7Yy9nBmPfqxjmogy8nhqNt8GyTbF8dBwXULdRk5k+d3qHM6izTHs5krSSpejeBlUNvImFWaKAu2NnOczaWhe3/+rUANnstltSKZ3UEQ==

I propose not requiring COMCIFS to formally approve the DDLm form of the remaining DDL1 dictionaries (electron density, twinning, restraints/constraints, modulated structures).  I expect that in each case the translation will be straightforward with no requirement for COMCIFS to approve new definitions or non-standard behaviour.

Instead I will provide the relevant authors with the DDLm versions for their comments, and then advise COMCIFS that the DDLm dictionary has been prepared, with links to the text as before.


T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148

Reply to: [list | sender only]