[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Approval of remaining DDLm dictionaries

  • To: "Discussion list of the IUCr Committee for the Maintenance of the CIF Standard (COMCIFS)" <comcifs@iucr.org>
  • Subject: Approval of remaining DDLm dictionaries
  • From: James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:37:01 +1100
  • DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;bh=zwQFDrlRFBbSmejxR6RIQYf/EbhAAmjLzw5VCNrwy4E=;b=qlWBYvRTb944PKiCIm1hsvC+YY4R3yuq2rUMf+md1kWEIH6RSNEvaQNLN78JBSxwO9C/3AmPt7fZMlDsKre707Zcq3olx/TjQw7ZOdLmYn6HaBipZcymgH9DqYaTZvZEU5AysCtUKOI7z8h+Un/2+Ax1UrWMyfeWwgyZL0doIjD2Ng7jA1depMccq/5T284E5IyllPSLUgXPXOZK/O0+h7nQoDw9ru+FoMWENSByrCHjQHt7Yy9nBmPfqxjmogy8nhqNt8GyTbF8dBwXULdRk5k+d3qHM6izTHs5krSSpejeBlUNvImFWaKAu2NnOczaWhe3/+rUANnstltSKZ3UEQ==
Dear COMCIFS,

I propose not requiring COMCIFS to formally approve the DDLm form of the remaining DDL1 dictionaries (electron density, twinning, restraints/constraints, modulated structures).  I expect that in each case the translation will be straightforward with no requirement for COMCIFS to approve new definitions or non-standard behaviour.

Instead I will provide the relevant authors with the DDLm versions for their comments, and then advise COMCIFS that the DDLm dictionary has been prepared, with links to the text as before.

James.

--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
_______________________________________________
comcifs mailing list
comcifs@iucr.org
http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/comcifs

Reply to: [list | sender only]