Purely calculated structural data in CIF
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Purely calculated structural data in CIF
- From: Mike Hoyland via coreDMG <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:03:10 +0000
- Cc: Mike Hoyland <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Dear All,We are currently working on improving the checkCIF handling of powder diffraction CIFs, and have coincidentally fallen across an issue with handling purely calculated structural data, e.g. by DFT calculation. So far we have relied on finding the use of "DFT" within various datanames, e.g.
There is no guarantee
of course that it would be present in this form.
Therefore, I would like to ask if anyone has any thoughts about how we would be able to simply identify or mark a particular structural datablock as containing calculated rather than experimental data.
With thanks for any thoughts or suggestions,Mike Hoyland
_______________________________________________ coreDMG mailing list coreDMG@iucr.org http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/coredmg
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
- RE: Purely calculated structural data in CIF (Bollinger, John C via coreDMG)
- Prev by Date: Re: Suggestions for microsymposium topics for IUCr 2023
- Next by Date: RE: Purely calculated structural data in CIF
- Prev by thread: Re: _database.dataset_doi - any problems if this might be a DOI forraw data?
- Next by thread: RE: Purely calculated structural data in CIF