[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles
- From: James H <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:59:11 +1100
- Cc: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- In-Reply-To: <CAM+dB2d2_stJ-Um-kakZxkjJSkmg9kpdgR7yn0wLGDQ7c8WYPA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAM+dB2fajH1c1vhrCJU9v-QQw0kt4Y2udDEx4HBK9QzDq=LD3w@mail.gmail.com><CH2PR04MB6950E54AF550C819FF598F35E0999@CH2PR04MB6950.namprd04.prod.outlook.com><CAM+dB2frS4Xg7fhxy5GQcw5t0WJ+pvia-HvqwLAzC-ySZoU+QQ@mail.gmail.com><CH2PR04MB695069448B0B396DE843ECEAE09C9@CH2PR04MB6950.namprd04.prod.outlook.com><CAM+dB2e-hSg5m4C7+MUbEWhK1ni2GOWWEWoGJCwS5_Xkq6uzuA@mail.gmail.com><CH2PR04MB6950FD4238F32E64416CAC4EE09F9@CH2PR04MB6950.namprd04.prod.outlook.com><CAM+dB2co6kOup_P9ZawKontOM+yE_CfFPh2NuVU0S6fvtT_T3w@mail.gmail.com><CH2PR04MB69507BF8620D6DC960DECEB6E0609@CH2PR04MB6950.namprd04.prod.outlook.com><CAM+dB2fiPmiCXJ8JSca8Uc3XvcNeSHJ-MkaKjN9OP1AVLTW-hQ@mail.gmail.com><CAM+dB2dPxtSED4ZdCQK2pkxb1mODU4DVo=LXy8GYG_5ngLfnJw@mail.gmail.com><CH2PR04MB695040138524F2B2D9BA925BE0689@CH2PR04MB6950.namprd04.prod.outlook.com><CAM+dB2dFR1QNrcKijrnJ=Hn6=bGdBs78TYE8L3SJrkiAu1nM8Q@mail.gmail.com><CH2PR04MB6950E1EE6CE63F28837519AEE06D9@CH2PR04MB6950.namprd04.prod.outlook.com><CAM+dB2d2_stJ-Um-kakZxkjJSkmg9kpdgR7yn0wLGDQ7c8WYPA@mail.gmail.com>
The discussion on the below topic appears to have concluded in Github.I will put together a final document based on the outcome there. On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 at 10:33, James H <jamesrhester@gmail.com> wrote:>> I have recreated the proposal in my most recent email to this group as> a github issue, the link is> https://github.com/COMCIFS/comcifs.github.io/issues/9 . Let's continue> discussion there.>> On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 at 01:19, Bollinger, John C> <John.Bollinger@stjude.org> wrote:> >> > Dear DDLm Group,> >> > Deferring for the moment any response to the technical proposal on the table, I agree with James that a GitHub discussion thread would provide a more convenient venue to carry on the conversation.> >> > John> >> >> --> T +61 (02) 9717 9907> F +61 (02) 9717 3145> M +61 (04) 0249 4148 -- T +61 (02) 9717 9907F +61 (02) 9717 3145M +61 (04) 0249 4148_______________________________________________ddlm-group mailing listddlm-group@iucr.orghttp://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- [ddlm-group] Multi block principles (James H)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles (James H)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles (James H)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles (James H)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles (James H)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles (James H)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles (James H)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles (James H)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles
- Next by Date: [ddlm-group] Adding one more built-in function to dREL
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Multi block principles
- Index(es):