[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [Imgcif-l] imgCIF X axis
- To: James Hester <[email protected]>, The Crystallographic Binary File and its imgCIF application to image data<[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [Imgcif-l] imgCIF X axis
- From: "Herbert J. Bernstein via imgcif-l" <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:33:34 -0400
- Cc: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <[email protected]>
- In-Reply-To: <CAM+dB2c5Hv=g03gGkC4==awB_ygVL6Hvdp-vf6R86pVOoRSmYQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAM+dB2c5Hv=g03gGkC4==awB_ygVL6Hvdp-vf6R86pVOoRSmYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Dear James,
This is a little tricky. The relevant rules are:
"Axis 1 (X): The X-axis is aligned to the mechanical axis pointing from
the sample or specimen along the principal axis of the goniometer."
"If the axis involved is a rotation axis, it is right-handed, i.e. as
one views the object to be rotated from the origin (the tail) of the
unit vector, the rotation is clockwise. If a translation axis is
specified, the direction of the unit vector specifies the sense of
positive translation"
So, yes the x-axis starts from the sample, but where it point to in the
goniometer depends on where in the goniometer the "principal"
axis of the goniometer points _and_ in which direction the axis
settings increase and whether the principal axis is a rotation
axis or a translation axis. The only way I have figured out to
do this is to start from the engineering diagrams (or at least
photos) of the goniometer, and even then, I once screwed up
the x-axis for a beamline at DLS (ask Graeme Winter).
Regards,
Herbert
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:38 AM James H via imgcif-l <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Dear imgCIF experts,
>
> Just to double-check, is it correct to say that the imgCIF X axis always
> points from the specimen towards the goniometer base? Closely parsing the
> dictionary and Volume G suggests that the X axis being "aligned" with the
> principal axis could also allow the X axis to point from the specimen away
> from the goniometer base, particularly if the sense of rotation of the
> principal goniometer axis is taken into account when defining X (is it?).
>
> thanks,
> James.
> --
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
> _______________________________________________
> imgcif-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/imgcif-l
_______________________________________________
imgcif-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/imgcif-l
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: [Imgcif-l] imgCIF X axis
- Next by Date: Re: [Imgcif-l] imgCIF X axis
- Prev by thread: [Imgcif-l] imgCIF X axis
- Next by thread: Re: [Imgcif-l] imgCIF X axis
- Index(es):

